On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Dave Everitt <dever...@innotts.co.uk>wrote:
> I'm not too bothered about 3k. But I think what Nokan's saying is that > he'd like Camping to remain functioning as it is so he can continue to run > his apps as they're set up now, but that extra features could be added with > an optional `require 'camping/new_extra_stuff`... - Nokan, is this correct? > Although I've no practical idea about how this might best be achieved - > DaveE > Exactly. That's what I wanted to say. I don't really care about the 3k, however it is charming for me. What I like in Camping is the simplicity. I don't need to be up-to-date in new inventions like in Rails. What I've learnt about Camping N years ago that's still true and works. It's enough if I have a massive Ruby knowledge and I'll be able to solve anything that comes up. Sometimes it is a bit too simple, sometimes it's not logical, and I can understand that people want it to be more supportive while working with it. If you could somehow make the shiny new version an extension of the existing one, then you could keep the 3k (or 4k) limit, and serve the needs of the extra features at the same time. Of course I don't know how to do it, or if it is possible at all. The source of Camping is something that I don't want to see again. :) u.
_______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
