>----- Original Message ----
>From: Phil & Anne Irons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Wednesday, 12 December, 2007 10:58:34 PM
>Subject: Re: [canals-list] Re: Norton Internet Security probs. Security Am I 
>alone?


>While I support your attitude, Brian, until Mozilla & Co can ABSOLUTELY
>guarantee that Firefox [which IS my default browser] will correctly
 display
>sites that are written specifically for IE, I will continue to have
 both
>installed on my computers.

>Microsoft sites especially will not run properly on Firefox, more's the
>pity.  Also, I'm not aware of anyway to install Windows, any flavour,
>without also installing IE.

>Arthur and succeeding posters are correct: Norton suite is the pits,
 and
>McAfee isn't far behind them, in my not so humble opinion.  I have very
>successfully used both AVG [Grisoft] and Avast! in the past, and I will
>continue to do so.

>Cheers,

>Phil
>nb convinced
>-- 
>Phil & Anne Irons
>Sydney, Nova Scotia



The problem with sites that don't render correctly under Firefox is often not
down to Firefox at all.  The problem is that Firefox expects the HTML
syntax to be correct, whereas IE often "corrects" minor errors before rendering.
If a site looks wrong with Firefox but correct with IE, the chances are it's
because the HTML is wrong, and the author has only tested it with IE.

I'm currently revamping my company's website, and, to date, all the issues
I've found between browsers has been down to IE not letting me see my
errors!!  If I was a cynic, I might suspect that some authoring products put
such errors in on purpose.

Cheers
Dave




      ___________________________________________________________
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good 
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to