Strudwick.Family wrote: > True to some extent but I can name two built by/for BW in the same > time span and ain't water features supposed to increase the value of > new houses? Strange no developers have thought running there own > facilities instead of handing them over to BW to run.
Oh, come on, Paul. You and I know that any land with PP in the London area is going to give any developer a nice fat bonus, with or without waterside. Not forgetting that a marina takes up a fair space, which could accommodate mucho hosing at a far greater profit. Come a lot farther North and then you'll find more new marinas. Mind you, I think that the previous owner where I am now has definitely scored over BW when he sold it to them (assuming the rumours of the settlement are true) - pontoons that all need replacing for H&S reasons, a dry dock that is only 60ft, and in serious need of a complete re-wire (so is not in use), toilets and showers that need re-building/re-wiring. Ron Jones Process Safety & Development Specialist Don't repeat history, unreported chemical lab/plant near misses at http://www.crhf.org.uk Only two things are certain: The universe and human stupidity; and I'm not certain about the universe. ~ Albert Einstein
