"Michael Askin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>I know a couple of folks here can answer this - on a heavy runs (for
>example river running) how much coal is used per hour and what does
>coal cost these days?
>
>The reason I ask is that I was talking about a boat on another forum
>that used 200 litres / hour (doing 35 knots), and then some one in the
>states put that into money cost, so I then told him how much fuel
>costs here, and then told him about the increase in costs. Then came
>up the cheapness of sailing, then someone mentioned coal was cheap.

A steam engine is very much less efficient than a diesel.  That's why
there are almost no commercial steam-powered vessels these days.  

When I was converting my barge (late 1980s), I looked seriously into
installing a (modern, fully automated, oil fired) steam engine in it.
I even had one designed, with a very clever boiler.  However, I
abandoned the idea when I came to the conclusion that it would use
well over twice as much oil per hour as a diesel.  

Ah, but the silence and lack of vibration would have been nice.  And a
whistle!

If I ever do another barge, I will seriously investigate an electric
drive.  If only there were a better and cost-effective technology for
storing electricity than lead-acid cells.

I know this doesn't answer the question, but I hope it is useful
background.  

It is my impression that coal is far from cheap.  But then, what does
"cheap" mean?  I think the comparison between the two fuels will have
to be on a £/kWh basis.  

Adrian

.

Adrian Stott
07956-299966

Reply via email to