Steve Haywood wrote:
> 2008/12/23 Captain Beeky <[email protected]>
>
>> On 23 Dec 2008, at 09:20, Steve Heaven wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 09:10 +0000, Adrian Stott wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> That's what I look for. I don't want to have to open the tin to find
>>>> out what is in it -- I want there to be a nice clear label.
>>>
>>> What, just like the nice clear labelling on http://www.sdfg.co.uk/ ?
>> Good heavens . Ho . . ho . . . ho !
>>
>
> Andrew! Behave! You mustn't misjudge him. There is not the slightest iota of
> evidence that Adrian is involved in the site in question and I am sure that
> if he is is there will be a perfectly rational explanation for why it is
> unlabelled when he so vehemently believes in labelling sites. Of course
> if he's not involved with the site I'm sure he would like to take the
> opportunity to condemn the way in which it is presented.
Yup, none at all.
If you watch closely you'll see one of two things:
a) complete silence for a couple of weeks before he returns on some
other subject
b) an attack on the grammar, spelling, whatever of one of the posters in
an attempt to drown the thread in noise
You might see an "oops, you're right, silly me I made a mistake". But
it's slightly less likely than that you'll see a group of flying pigs
skating around hell.
Some random info that happens to have got stuck on here some how:
Domain name:
sdfg.co.uk
Registrant:
Adrian Stott
Trading as:
Adrian Stott
Registrant type:
UK Individual
Registrant's address:
The registrant is a non-trading individual who has opted to
have their
address omitted from the WHOIS service.
