--- In [email protected], Trevor <listsandst...@...> wrote:
> Surely it is *BW* who should be making all the rules about what happens 
> on the waters they control - wasn't that one of their *own* original 
> purposes?
> 
> Or is that taking a much too simplistic approach?
> 
> Trevor

I think what happend was that he MCA was given authority over inshore and 
inland in 2003, but nobody looked into the inland side of it, saying nothing is 
the same as agreeing with it. Then BW woke up, way too late to see that the MCA 
are now ruling over their patch. We`re now caught in the middle, with no 
direction from either.
BW could finish the trade licence for boats and issue a towpath trading 
licence, which would take us out from under the MCA, back to the control of BW.

Garry 

Reply via email to