>In any case, it isn't what they are called that is particularly the point at >issue, it's the claim made by Adrian that Foxton's side ponds/pounds are >fundamentally different from those at Caen Hill, Bratch etc. and that the >side lakes ( :-) ) at Foxton are, technically speaking, related to the water >saving side ponds to be found beside some locks on the GU etc.
>Regards >Bru And I would agree with him. At Foxton they are a series of side ponds into which the water is tipped or withdrawn as necessary. The pounds between the locks at Bratch are fundamentally different. Colin [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
