I am not seeing "--no-backup" option being applied along with phablet-flash in
the tests that Francis posted. I could have missed something in the thread.
Was that a necessitiy in the UM configs? I would think not.
On 07/11/13 14:14, Rick Fowler wrote:
That sounds like what I've been seeing.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Francis Ginther
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
I put my maguro in a flash loop overnight, it got stuck on the 4th
iteration. After tapping the power button, it's just sitting there
telling me about the "Right edge". It does not show up under 'adb
devices'.
Francis
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Rick Fowler
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> They aren't dead, just unreachable via adb. Before I pop the
battery or
> reset them they are up and functional. Unplugging/plugging the usb
> connector has no effect. I rarely need to reflash them.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Paul Larson
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think so, last I remember there was a fix for that put into
>> phablet-tools to keep it from flashing concurrently.
>>
>> Francis, what state are the phones in when they die like this?
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2013 4:18 PM, "Andy Doan" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/06/2013 03:45 PM, Francis Ginther wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Paul,
>>>>
>>>> Here is the contents of the flash job between the BEGIN and END
>>>> markers, image_type=trusty-proposed. Another possible
difference to
>>>> keep in mind is that the phones are flashed right after the test
>>>> completes, so they aren't sitting there idle before the flash
starts.
>>>> I also have a maguro here, I'll setup an overnight flash loop
and see
>>>> what happens.
>>>>
>>>> Francis
>>>>
>>>> # BEGIN
>>>> # Install the latest requested image
>>>> phablet-flash ubuntu-system --serial $ANDROID_SERIAL --channel
>>>> $image_type --bootstrap
>>>>
>>>> adb -s $ANDROID_SERIAL wait-for-device
>>>> sleep 60
>>>> # END
>>>
>>>
>>> Paul - Could this be related to concurrent use of FastBoot? I
forgot
>>> where things stood there, but I remember us having to use
flocks around
>>> fastboot calls at Linaro.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
<https://launchpad.net/%7Ecanonical-ci-engineering>
>> Post to : [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
<https://launchpad.net/%7Ecanonical-ci-engineering>
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
<https://launchpad.net/%7Ecanonical-ci-engineering>
> Post to : [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
<https://launchpad.net/%7Ecanonical-ci-engineering>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
--
Francis Ginther
Canonical - Ubuntu Engineering - Continuous Integration Team
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ci-engineering
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
