I totally agree, Ara. That approach gets a hearty endorsement from me.
Still, it'd be nice to make it easier to do basic shell scripting
directly via Capistrano. Even if it was a helper that just uploaded the
script to /tmp on the remote servers and invoked it.
- Jamis
On 1/12/09 10:21 AM, ara.t.howard wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Jamis Buck wrote:
>
>>> more clear anyway, though I'm definitely not sure how one could do
>>> "&"...
>
>
> fork{ fork{ system command } and exit! } and Process.wait # this is
> '&'
>
> the biggest issue, really, is people doing crappy shell scripting that
> should be done in ruby. what we do is make rake tasks to perform any
> key operation, they all cap run command simply looking like
>
> run 'rake some:thing:like:this'
>
> which vastly simplifies getting deployment right.
>
> just food for thought.
>
> cheers.
>
> a @ http://codeforpeople.com/
> --
> we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being
> better. simply reflect on that.
> h.h. the 14th dalai lama
>
>
>
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
capistrano-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
