cWarren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > We are in the process of organizing the agenda - one of the things > which we heard from you at the BoFs is that you would like something > like a "survey of the industry" (e.g motivation for deploying a CP) and > a more complete understanding of why captive portal operators do things > like defeating / whitelisting the captive portal probes.
Sure...
> Mark Nottingham is already working on a "problem statement" type draft
> with outlines some of this, but we'd like more viewpoints/ discussions.
> His initial submission is here: "Before You Log In, Here's A Brief
> Message From Our Sponsors!" - draft-nottingham-capport-problem
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-capport-problem/)
A good read, where are we going with this document?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
