Mark Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: > ... and that's really just a regurgitation of what we previously put > together at <https://github.com/httpwg/wiki/wiki/Captive-Portals>. If > people have suggestions, corrections, pull requests, etc. I'm all ears.
I feel that the DNS poisioning "inconvenience" is understated. Particularly on portal timeout, if your next DNS request involves a site that would be HTTPS, most users are screwed, and in "reboot computer" state. I have been trying to contact captive portal owners in my local area. Many smaller entities have done something in-house, but the incumbent telco's "DataValet" division has very widespread deployment. It would be very nice if we could cause some phone calls to occur behind the scenes. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
