On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:04 PM Livingood, Jason <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2/15/16, 12:46 PM, "Captive-portals on behalf of Warren Kumari" < > [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > We are in the process of organizing the agenda - one of the things which > we heard from you at the BoFs is that you would like something like a > "survey of the industry" (e.g motivation for deploying a CP) and a more > complete understanding of why captive portal operators do things like > defeating / whitelisting the captive portal probes. > > > Speaking as an operator there is a wide range of ways we use captive > portal like tools. I’m happy to try to organize a presentation if that is > helpful. Our definition of “captive portal” may be a bit broader than folks > on this list may think, so it may be interesting. > Yes please. I think that it would be very useful to get views from operators. This working group is likely to be run somewhat differently to other working groups - a fair bit of it will be getting operators, vendors and users to talk together, and understand each others views. W > > So, if you develop and / or operate a CP, we'd really like to hear from > you - we give priority agenda time to drafts which have had online > discussion, but may be willing to also have more of a discussion type > presentation. > > > One person who may have interesting thoughts to contribute is Steve Bauer > from MIT, copied here. He has a novel idea for the need to have a > portal-like communication channel to end users that he’s called “net.info” > as a working title. I wonder if that might have some applicability here. > > - Jason > > >
_______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
