Thanks Donna & David for your suggestions! I actually used FLIRT instead of
FNIRT to normalize my data.

I tried the Conte69 atlas (again using the FLIRT space during surface
mapping) and still couldn't see the precuneus cluster.

I'll try Donna's suggestions to see what's going on.

-- Dale


> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. A precuneus cluster disappeared after surface     projection
>       (Ping-Hui Chiu)
>    2. Re: A precuneus cluster disappeared after surface projection
>       (Donna Dierker)
>    3. Re: A precuneus cluster disappeared after surface projection
>       (David Van Essen)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:18:11 -0600
> From: Ping-Hui Chiu <chiuping...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [caret-users] A precuneus cluster disappeared after surface
>         projection
> To: caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> Message-ID:
>         <
> canbyug5d3epceq7gqk+1hs22h9y+xov1negyrpqmtw1531j...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Dear Caret experts,
>
> I've been using Caret v5.65 without any problems but today I found that the
> attached contrast can't be seen on the PALS_B12 surface.
>
> This contrast shows a precuneus cluster of intensity 0.999 (33 voxels
> surrounding 4/-72/46 in the MNI152 space). It can be seen just fine by
> FSLView & Mango in the volume space. However, it disappeared after surface
> projection using the FLIRT space and various mapping algorithms, such as
> METRIC_ENCLOSING_VOXEL, METRIC_MAXIMUM_VOXEL with neighbor box size=0, etc.
>
> It doesn't look like a threshold problem because I still can't see it with
> a 0 threshold. What may be wrong here? Any hints will surely be helpful!
>
> Thanks!
> Dale
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/pipermail/caret-users/attachments/20120915/2fda699e/attachment-0001.html
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: precuneus.nii.gz
> Type: application/x-gzip
> Size: 3769 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/pipermail/caret-users/attachments/20120915/2fda699e/attachment-0001.gz
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 19:18:20 -0500
> From: Donna Dierker <donna.dier...@sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: [caret-users] A precuneus cluster disappeared after
>         surface projection
> To: "Caret, SureFit, and SuMS software users"
>         <caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu>
> Message-ID: <d438bec6-6f57-4d4f-8e85-af698cb41...@sbcglobal.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Dale,
>
> In situations like this, I get the anatomical template image used as the
> atlas target for spatial normalization.  Flirt and fnirt both use the
> avg152T1, but different versions.  Load your atlas target in Caret, and
> overlay the surface outline of the PALS mean surface used as a mapping
> substrate.  Then load your precuneus cluster volume and overlay that over
> all.  You might need help at one or more of these steps, but this is how
> you will get to the bottom of the missing cluster.
>
> If you used fnirt to get stuff on avg152, then there's a decent chance
> your cluster won't intersect the mean PALS surface well.  Seeing the
> intersection of the anatomical volume, mean surface, and functional volume
> will tell us how to fix the problem.
>
> Donna
>
>
> On Sep 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Ping-Hui Chiu wrote:
>
> > Dear Caret experts,
> >
> > I've been using Caret v5.65 without any problems but today I found that
> the attached contrast can't be seen on the PALS_B12 surface.
> >
> > This contrast shows a precuneus cluster of intensity 0.999 (33 voxels
> surrounding 4/-72/46 in the MNI152 space). It can be seen just fine by
> FSLView & Mango in the volume space. However, it disappeared after surface
> projection using the FLIRT space and various mapping algorithms, such as
> METRIC_ENCLOSING_VOXEL, METRIC_MAXIMUM_VOXEL with neighbor box size=0, etc.
> >
> > It doesn't look like a threshold problem because I still can't see it
> with a 0 threshold. What may be wrong here? Any hints will surely be
> helpful!
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Dale
> > <precuneus.nii.gz>_______________________________________________
> > caret-users mailing list
> > caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> > http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:34:28 -0500
> From: David Van Essen <vanes...@wustl.edu>
> Subject: Re: [caret-users] A precuneus cluster disappeared after
>         surface projection
> To: "Caret, SureFit, and SuMS software users"
>         <caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu>
> Message-ID: <cb079117-e2d7-4000-ace0-00686b220...@wustl.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hello Dale,
>
> If Donna's explanation is correct (as I suspect is the case), you may have
> better results using the Conte69 atlas surface that is registered to the
> FNIRT MNI152 volume,  In general, we are encouraging investigators to
> migrate to this atlas for a number of reasons, including the fact that this
> will be the atlas surface used by the Human Connectome Project.  To learn
> more about the Conte69 atlas surfaces, visit
> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/wiki/index.php/Caret:Atlases:Conte69_Atlas.
>
> To download the atlas datasets, go to
> http://sumsdb.wustl.edu/sums/directory.do?id=8291494&dir_name=CONTE69 and
> decide on which datasets are useful for you - they differ in the mesh (74k
> or 164k) and data format (caret5 and Connectome Workbench).  The Readme
> includes information about how to migrate data from the PALS-B12 74k mesh
> to the Conte69 164k mesh.
>
> I hope this helps.  If questions or problems arise, please let us know.
>
> David VE
>
>
> On Sep 15, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Donna Dierker wrote:
>
> > Dale,
> >
> > In situations like this, I get the anatomical template image used as the
> atlas target for spatial normalization.  Flirt and fnirt both use the
> avg152T1, but different versions.  Load your atlas target in Caret, and
> overlay the surface outline of the PALS mean surface used as a mapping
> substrate.  Then load your precuneus cluster volume and overlay that over
> all.  You might need help at one or more of these steps, but this is how
> you will get to the bottom of the missing cluster.
> >
> > If you used fnirt to get stuff on avg152, then there's a decent chance
> your cluster won't intersect the mean PALS surface well.  Seeing the
> intersection of the anatomical volume, mean surface, and functional volume
> will tell us how to fix the problem.
> >
> > Donna
> >
> >
> > On Sep 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Ping-Hui Chiu wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Caret experts,
> >>
> >> I've been using Caret v5.65 without any problems but today I found that
> the attached contrast can't be seen on the PALS_B12 surface.
> >>
> >> This contrast shows a precuneus cluster of intensity 0.999 (33 voxels
> surrounding 4/-72/46 in the MNI152 space). It can be seen just fine by
> FSLView & Mango in the volume space. However, it disappeared after surface
> projection using the FLIRT space and various mapping algorithms, such as
> METRIC_ENCLOSING_VOXEL, METRIC_MAXIMUM_VOXEL with neighbor box size=0, etc.
> >>
> >> It doesn't look like a threshold problem because I still can't see it
> with a 0 threshold. What may be wrong here? Any hints will surely be
> helpful!
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Dale
> >> <precuneus.nii.gz>_______________________________________________
> >> caret-users mailing list
> >> caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> >> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > caret-users mailing list
> > caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> > http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> caret-users mailing list
> caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
>
>
> End of caret-users Digest, Vol 108, Issue 4
> *******************************************
>
_______________________________________________
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users

Reply via email to