> Matt- > Good summary. Let me correct recent changes: > B05, B10, and B15 FPGA 4 each have two active XAUI ports (one of them runs > both with fiber CX4, I think, the others are a mix), and one active 10GbE > port. > Have several copies of similar firmware running on B16. > > Correct that we do not run high speed on the center FPGA - corners only > right now. Also do not have any designs with more than one 10GbE port per > FPGA (most of our interchip comm is XAUI), so I don't know how helpful > these numbers are. > > John: > Have you been locking up the same FPGA every time, or can you lock up any > arbitrary user FPGA? I've seen some effects (link reliability / BER, > ability to drive fiber CX4) where there is measurable variation between > different user fpgas. So far, I have not correlated user-fpga-location to > firmware lockups, but wouldn't immediately rule it out, esp. if this > wasn't a design to be run on all corners.
We've only tried it on this one FPGA. (user-2) It's the output of our coherent dispersion machine, and all 4 ports are used to send data to the switch for distribution to the GPU machines. One other FPGA has 4 xaui links, but they are only used to receive data on that fpga, so it doesn't really drive anything. The way our logic works, all four ports fire off an 8K packet simultaneously. We've speculated that maybe that's too much drive power at one instant. We haven't done any probing with the scope on the power supplies as of yet. It's weird that whatever is going on would lock up the selectmap interface between the FPGA's. We always seem to find the corner cases. Sigh. John > > Billy > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: casper-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu on behalf of Matt Dexter > Sent: Wed 2/3/2010 8:14 PM > To: casper@lists.berkeley.edu > Subject: Re: [casper] 10 GbE ports on a BEE2 > > Hi, > > I'm not sure this is too helpful as this system uses 10 Gbps XAUI and not > 10 GbE (and I'm sure Billy Barott could say more) but for the record (and > since Dan asked) I believe the ATA Beamformer's 16 BEE2s are cabled as > > ATA BF number of 10 Gbps ports used per BEE2 and FPGA : > > BEE2 Center Corner FPGAs > FPGA 1 2 3 4 > BF1 > B01 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B02 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B03 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B04 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B05 0+0 2+2 3+0 3+0 0+0 > > BF2 > B06 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B07 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B08 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B09 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B10 0+0 3+1 3+0 3+0 0+0 > > BF3 > B11 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B12 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B13 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B14 0+0 3+0 1+2 4+0 3+0 > B15 0+0 2+1 3+0 3+0 0+0 > > etc > B16 0+0 0+0 2+1 1+2 1+0 > > First number is number of passive copper CX4 cables. > Second number is number of active fiber optic CX4 cables. > The maximum number of usable active CX4 cables per BEE2 is quite low > due to power supply limitiations. > > I believe various lab tests were done using 1 of the 2 > high speed ports on the center FPGA but at the moment none > are in use at the observatory (as far as I know). > > Matt Dexter > > On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, John Ford wrote: > >> Hi all. Has anyone seen any problems when using 4 10 GbE ports on a >> single FPGA in the BEE2? >> >> We're having some problems where borph access from the control FPGA >> seems >> to lock up when we start up our designs. We've done some testing with >> hacked up designs, and we can only make it lock up (so far) when we have >> 4 >> 10 gbe ports active. Interestingly, some of the 10 GbE ports also seem >> to >> lock up at that very instant. >> >> The fpga still is running, but the control fpga cannot talk to it OR ANY >> OF THE OTHER 3 FPGA's. If you kill the borph process on the control >> fpga >> and restart it, it comes back to life. >> >> We don't know what goes on under the hood of the yellow block system, >> but >> it seems that something is going wrong with whatever mechanism controls >> the bus to the control fpga. >> >> John >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
