Hi Mark, I got some errors as follows when I tried to specify the parameters for fft or pfb (although I have updated the ISE 10.1 to SP3) -
############################# ## System Update ## ############################# Error using ==> set_param Error in 'r_spec_2048_r103/pfb_fir_real': Initialization commands cannot be evaluated. MATLAB error message: Error using ==> set_param Error in 'r_spec_2048_r103/pfb_fir_real/pol1_in1_last_tap': Initialization commands cannot be evaluated. MATLAB error message: Error using ==> get_param Invalid Simulink object name: r_spec_2048_r103/pfb_fir_real/pol1_in1_last_tap/pfb_real_add_tree. ############################# ## System Update ## ############################# Error using ==> set_param Error in 'r_spec_2048_r103/pfb_fir_real': Initialization commands cannot be evaluated. MATLAB error message: Error using ==> set_param Error in 'r_spec_2048_r103/pfb_fir_real/pol1_in1_last_tap': Initialization commands cannot be evaluated. MATLAB error message: Error using ==> get_param Invalid Simulink object name: r_spec_2048_r103/pfb_fir_real/pol1_in1_last_tap/pfb_real_add_tree. Warning: Block diagram 'r_spec_2048_r103' contains one or more parameterized library links. To find the parameterized links use the Model Advisor. The diagram has been saved but may not behave as you intended. Warning: Block diagram 'r_spec_2048_r103' contains one or more disabled library links. To find the disabled links use the Model Advisor. The diagram has been saved but may not contain what you intended. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- any suggestion? Chao-Te -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Mark Wagner <[email protected]> To: Chao-Te Li <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Sun, 2 May 2010 22:59:34 -0700 Subject: Re: [casper] casper Digest, Vol 30, Issue 1 > Hi Chao-Te, > > The 100% utilization of DSP48's seems to be your problem. I would > try using slices instead. In the fft and pfb paramater box, you can > do this by checking 'specify multiplier use' and then entering in a > vector that specifies the multipliers you want to use. I think you > want 'behavioral,' so if you have a 2^7 fft, you would enter in: [2 > 2 2 2 2 2 2]. > > Mark > > On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Chao-Te Li <[email protected] > that unless you dig deep into the design, you're nota.edu.tw> wrote: > > > Hi Mark, > > > > Thanks for the help. > > I copy the utility summary from MATLAB as follows - > > > > Device Utilization Summary: > > > > Number of BUFGs 3 out of 32 9% > > Number of DCM_ADVs 1 out of 12 8% > > Number of DSP48Es 64 out of 64 100% > > Number of ILOGICs 65 out of 800 8% > > Number of External IOBs 97 out of 640 15% > > Number of LOCed IOBs 97 out of 97 100% > > > > Number of External IOBMs 1 out of 320 1% > > Number of LOCed IOBMs 1 out of 1 100% > > > > Number of External IOBSs 1 out of 320 1% > > Number of LOCed IOBSs 1 out of 1 100% > > > > Number of OLOGICs 5 out of 800 1% > > Number of RAMB18X2s 50 out of 148 33% > > Number of RAMB36_EXPs 14 out of 148 9% > > Number of Slice Registers 21382 out of 69120 30% > > Number used as Flip Flops 21382 > > Number used as Latches 0 > > Number used as LatchThrus 0 > > > > Number of Slice LUTS 21127 out of 69120 30% > > Number of Slice LUT-Flip Flop pairs 27717 out of 69120 40% > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > The model does use up all the DSP48Es (and some other devices). > > But they are at most 100%. So it's ok in terms of resources? > > > > Regards, > > Chao-Te > > > > > > -- > > Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) > > > > > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > > From: Mark Wagner <[email protected]> > > To: Chao-Te Li <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Sent: Sun, 2 May 2010 21:48:48 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [casper] casper Digest, Vol 30, Issue 1 > > > > > Hi Chao-Te, > > > > > > To answer you question, the xps executable should be in the EDK > > directory. > > > For instance, ours is located here: > > > > > > /opt/Xilinx/11.1/EDK/bin/lin64/xps > > > > > > I haven't directly used xps on windows, but I think it should be > > something > > > like this: > > > > > > C:\Xilinx\10.1\EDK\bin\nt\xps.exe > > > > > > >From the XPS_ROACH_base directory on linux I run the command: > > > > > > $xps -nw system.xmp > > > > > > Although, before you try to remove this error, I would check to see > > > what the utilization report looks like and if you actually have the > > > resources to build the design. You can find this report in: > > > > > > <model_directory>/XPS_ROACH_base/implementation/system_map.mrp > > > > > > The example spectrometer was designed for the sx95t and may not fit > > > on the lx110t (which doesn't have very many dsp48's). > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Chao-Te Li > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I was compiling the wideband spectrometer from the 2009 tutorials. > > > > http://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/Tutorials > > > > > > > > It was compilted well with ROACH:sx95t. but when I chose > > > > ROACH:lx110t, I got the following error message and suggestion - > > > > > > > > > > > > xilperl D:/Xilinx/EDK/data/fpga_impl/observe_par.pl -error yes > > > > implementation/system.par > > > > Analyzing implementation/system.par > > > > > > > > > > > > ***************************************************************************** > > > > *** > > > > ERROR: 1 constraint not met. > > > > > > > > PAR could not meet all timing constraints. A bitstream will not be > > > > generated. > > > > > > > > To disable the PAR timing check: > > > > > > > > 1> Disable the "Treat timing closure failure as error" option from the > > > > Project Options dialog in XPS. > > > > > > > > OR > > > > > > > > 2> Type following at the XPS prompt: > > > > XPS% xset enable_par_timing_error 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > How do I do to bring up the XPS or its prompt? > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Sent: Sat, 01 May 2010 12:55:16 -0700 > > > > Subject: casper Digest, Vol 30, Issue 1 > > > > > > > > > Send casper mailing list submissions to > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://calmail.berkeley.edu/manage/list/listinfo/[email protected] > > > > ey.edu > > > > > > > > > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > > > > than "Re: Contents of casper digest..." > > > > > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Re: 'The Great Debate: Are We Alone?' (Tonight) (dana whitlow) > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > Message: 1 > > > > > Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:15:22 -0400 > > > > > From: dana whitlow <[email protected]> > > > > > Subject: Re: [casper] 'The Great Debate: Are We Alone?' (Tonight) > > > > > To: melvyn wright <[email protected]> > > > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > > > > > > > Good idea- we'll just hook that right up. Let's see now- should it > > > > > be 430 MHz or 2380 MHz? > > > > > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > > > > > melvyn wright wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:13 PM, David Hawkins > > <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>> will the debate be recorded, and available later for humans or > > for > > > > LGMs ? > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> Shouldn't we be blasting it out into space for the LGMs > > > > > >> to listen to live? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> :) > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > not according to > > > > > > > > http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/DC-Decoder/2010/0430/Stephen- > > > > Hawking-alien-warning-Could-we-talk-to-them > > > > > > > > > > > > :-( > > > > > > > > > > > > M. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > End of casper Digest, Vol 30, Issue 1 > > > > > ************************************* > > > > ------- End of Original Message ------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------- End of Original Message ------- > > > > ------- End of Original Message -------
