The DC bias comes from the ADC itself, which is biased to be symmetrical about 
-0.5 (not 0).

Jason


On 03 Mar 2011, at 01:42, Dan Werthimer wrote:

> 
> 
> hi andrew, mandana,
> 
> i think all the casper adc boards
> have balun transformers or ac coupling
> capacitors, so a signal's DC bias
> can't get to the ADC.
> 
> dan
> 
> On 03/01/2011 10:44 PM, Andrew Martens wrote:
>> Hi Mandana
>> 
>> 
>>      fft_shift is set to 0xffffffff by default in tutorial 4 poco
>>    design. Any other suggestions?
>>    When I monitor my ADC input levels, they are about 4.6 bit used.
>> 
>> 
>> Ok, well that should rule out overflows from the FFT.
>> 
>> I assume that there is no clipping with terminated inputs?
>> At what power level does overflow _not_ happen?
>> 
>> Is there any DC bias in your input signal? A DC blocking filter is
>> good here as this may be causing overflow in the FFT.
>> 
>> The DC channel will often cause the equaliser overrange bit to be set
>> as the value in this channel is much larger than the others. This is not
>> a problem as long as there is no overflow in the FFT.
>> 
>>> 
>>>        My next question is what is the dip that I see in the middle
>>>        of the auto- and cross-correlation plots, regardless of
>>>        signals applied or just terminated inputs.
>>> 
>>>    Not so sure about this, possibly include a plot if you can.
>>    Please see the attached plot. I have a Roach board and 2 x 1GS/s ADC
>>    boards. In this plot, a 500MHz sine is connected to the first input
>>    (channel a), while the other 3 inputs are terminated (channels b, c,
>>    d) and an 800MHz clock is supplied. What is the small dip in the
>>    centre (@channel 500).  This is also present in the plot posted on
>>    page 15 of casper_workshop_tut4.pdf.
>> 
>> I have no idea to be honest. There are some artifacts but there
>> has not been a study on what these are and what causes them
>> yet. They are generally very small, stable and can be catered
>> for in any final system.
>> 
>> Sorry I have not been more useful.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Andrew
> 
> -- 
> 
> Dan Werthimer
> Space Sciences Lab and Berkeley Wireless Research Center
> University of Calfornia, Berkeley
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to