On 10/02/2012 12:03 AM, homin wrote:
We have been using Scientific Linux for a while. It have been working
well so far basically. But we never compiled 8K point FFT, and we
experienced strange behavior at the very beginning.
Is it possible to have one host dedicated to the toolflow and do your
scientific processing elsewhere? We even use different hosts for
testing with our ROACH boards, which do carry a pretty full suite of
science packages.
Tom
cheers
homin jiang of ASIAA
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:18:21 -0700, [email protected]
wrote:
Send casper mailing list submissions to
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://calmail.berkeley.edu/manage/list/listinfo/[email protected]
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of casper digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Scientific Linux vs CentOS (Nimish Sane)
2. Re: Scientific Linux vs CentOS (Dan Werthimer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 12:11:33 -0400
From: Nimish Sane<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [casper] Scientific Linux vs CentOS
To: casper list<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Message-ID:
<CA+VQD=quheduva8d448jnvebaswjbs_4xcshtsgqcc6dwse...@mail.gmail.com
<mailto:CA+VQD=quheduva8d448jnvebaswjbs_4xcshtsgqcc6dwse...@mail.gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi all,
I have tried to search documentation and email archive without any
convincing answer, so my apologies if I am repeating an already settled
question.
We currently use CentOS on our machine that we use for running CASPER
toolflow for Roach 2. We are in the process of procuring a new machine and
our institute recommends using Scientific Linux (SL) instead of CentOS. I
understand that they are clones of RHE and SL is a closer clone than
CentOS. I am also told that anything that runs on CentOS will run on SL.
I want to know if anyone has been using the CAPSER toolflow successfully on
SL or ran into any problems? We need to make this decision soon and it
would be very helpful to know of others' experience.
Many thanks,
Nimish
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment scrubbed and removed.
HTML attachments are only available in MIME digests.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:51:23 -0700
From: Dan Werthimer<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [casper] Scientific Linux vs CentOS
To: Nimish Sane<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: casper list<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Message-ID:
<CAGHS_vG_qM=dm6p8hxakjsho8p7vuamq7etpnykxabuecqg...@mail.gmail.com
<mailto:CAGHS_vG_qM=dm6p8hxakjsho8p7vuamq7etpnykxabuecqg...@mail.gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
hi nimish,
we haven't run SL, but we have run into some strange
problems with linux operating systems that are not
supported by xilinx. for instance, fft's that are longer
than 8K points don't work correctly on some non-supported
operating systems. and you don't get an error message during compilation
- you just see flaky results from your fft. when we contacted xilinx
about it, they said they wouldn't research our problem unless we used a
supported
operating system. when we switched to RHEL5, the problem
went away.
best wishes,
dan
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Nimish Sane<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all, I have tried to search documentation and email archive
without any convincing answer, so my apologies if I am repeating an
already settled question. We currently use CentOS on our machine
that we use for running CASPER toolflow for Roach 2. We are in the
process of procuring a new machine and our institute recommends
using Scientific Linux (SL) instead of CentOS. I understand that
they are clones of RHE and SL is a closer clone than CentOS. I am
also told that anything that runs on CentOS will run on SL. I want
to know if anyone has been using the CAPSER toolflow successfully on
SL or ran into any problems? We need to make this decision soon and
it would be very helpful to know of others' experience. Many thanks,
Nimish
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment scrubbed and removed.
HTML attachments are only available in MIME digests.
End of casper Digest, Vol 59, Issue 1
*************************************
--
I or me? http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/page/145
