Hi Joe

I As long as your passive heatsink with forced air cooling is able to
comfortably dissipate 40W of heat from the fpga I see no problem with this
idea.

Regards


On 19 November 2012 22:13, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Send casper mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> https://calmail.berkeley.edu/manage/list/listinfo/[email protected]
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of casper digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: ROACH2 updates - uboot, kernel,       romfs and tcpborphserver3
>       (David MacMahon)
>    2. Virtex 6 Heat Sink (Joe Greenberg)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:33:30 -0800
> From: David MacMahon <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [casper] ROACH2 updates - uboot, kernel,   romfs and
>         tcpborphserver3
> To: Marc Welz <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Thanks, Marc,
>
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 6:42 AM, Marc Welz wrote:
>
> > It is possible to add to the bootargs variable (accidentally) by
> > running a soloboot, interrupting it (or it failing) and then doing a
> > saveenv.
>
> That sounds like something that might have happened.
>
>
> >> setenv bootargs console=ttyS0,115200
> >
> > Yup, that is what it should be - to check do a clearenv and then a reset.
>
> Running "strings u-boot-r2-rev1.bin | grep bootargs=" confirms that this
> is indeed the default value.
>
> >
> >> Another macro that seem superfluous is "rootpath=/dev/mtdblock1".  The
> rootpath macro is only used in the netboot macro where it is replaced by
> the value from the DHCP server.  Does defining rootpath explicitly provide
> any benefit that I'm not seeing?
> >
> > It is vestigal: The platform port we based our port on has the
> > rootpath in a separate #define in the uboot config (CONFIG_ROOTPATH -
> > see the roach2 config above), which suggests it was/will/could be used
> > in the code proper somehow - so I erred on the side of caution and
> > kept it in there.  But as it stands it seems used so if there are
> > strong feelings I can remove it :)
>
> One reason for removing it is that it ends up in /proc/cmdline.  Startup
> scripts that parse /proc/cmdline might get confused (or need to be more
> complicated) by having two rootpath= parameters there.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:04:09 -0500
> From: Joe Greenberg <[email protected]>
> Subject: [casper] Virtex 6 Heat Sink
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> We are planning to rack mount Roach 2 Cards with forced air cooling in
> the ALMA Correlator.
>
> In this configuration, a passive heat sink on the Virtex 6 seems more
> appropriate than the Fan based Vantec heat sinks.
>
> Does this seem an appropriate way to go?
>
> Has anyone operated Roach 2 boards with passive heat sinks before?
>
> Does anyone have any specific heat sinks to recommend?  Vantec does not
> seem to make passive heat sinks.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
>
>
>
> End of casper Digest, Vol 60, Issue 27
> **************************************
>



-- 
Vaughan Moss
DBE
SKA SA
3rd Floor, The Park
Park Road
Pinelands
7405
South Africa
Tel:     +27 (0)21 506 7363
Fax:     +27 (0)21 506 7375
Email:    [email protected]
Web:      www.ska.ac.za

Reply via email to