Hi

In the attached picture you can see the fft xilinx blocks I found.

Which one should I use?
How should I set this block?


2016-01-20 3:06 GMT-06:00 Ryan Monroe <[email protected]>:

> I don't use the stock CASPER FFTs anymore, but I'm pretty sure that
> there's no way to use them for anything less than {2 complex inputs --OR--
> 4 real inputs}.  If you want less, you can drive an input with a constant
> '0', but resource-wise, they're the same.  This is because of algorithmic
> limitations; there is a resource efficiency you gain by doing two complex
> FFTs at once.
>
> This is a time for a streaming Xilinx FFT.
>
> --Ryan
>
>
> On 01/19/2016 09:49 PM, James Smith wrote:
>
> Hi Rolando,
>
> I can't recall that it does, off the top of my head, but the Casper one
> can be set up to use just one input. This is what I've done in the past, I
> think.
>
> Regards,
> James
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Rolando Paz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi James and Andrew
>>
>> Thank for yours advices.
>>
>> I'm trying to recompile the design of Peter McMahon:
>> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/Parspec
>>
>> I'm using these libraries:
>>
>> https://github.com/casper-astro/mlib_devel/tree/mlib_devel-2010-09-20
>>
>> and I use a virtual machine "windows XP SP3", on ubuntu 14.04LTS, Matlab
>> R2007b,
>> ISE, EDK, SG 10.1, with respective updates, IBOB+QUADC.
>>
>> With this configuration, I can not compile this new design.
>>
>> I'll try with Xilinx FFT...
>> Is there a Xilinx block version for the PFB too?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-01-19 23:23 GMT-06:00 Andrew Martens < <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]>:
>>
>>> Hi Rolando
>>>
>>> You may want to look at the Xilinx FFT for your use case. The CASPER FFT
>>> is optimised so that minimal resources are used when processing high
>>> bandwidths (either many inputs, or inputs captured at high sample rates).
>>> In this case you may find that the Xilinx FFT actually uses fewer
>>> resources.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Rolando Paz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Is there any other FFT block that I can use with ADC4x250-8?
>>>>
>>>> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/ADC4x250-8
>>>>
>>>> I am using the "fft_biplex_real_2x" block, however I need only one
>>>> input of the four that this block has. I placed at zero the others three
>>>> inputs.
>>>>
>>>> I need more FPGA resources from IBOB, and I think using another FFT
>>>> block may be one solution.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>>
>>>> RP
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to