Thanks, Dave for the tutorial, and thanks, Jack. Jack you say: > On Aug 14, 2018, at 6:01 PM, Jack Hickish <[email protected]> wrote: > > The biplex FFT which Dave mentions does all the 2 x real = 1 x complex > tricks. However, in the fft_wideband_real block, this is followed by a > parallel FFT direct block which doesn't have any of these optimizations, and > is thus ~2x bigger than it needs to be.
This was how it looked to us, and I think encapsulates exactly the concern. It really seemed odd to me that it has this inefficiency as I was more expecting the world to look the way Dave described it. We are looking at Ryan’s paper, and note the Github link. Jonathan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
