Hi Matheus, That's interesting! You might be right about the version difference. Or, maybe I was just wrong (though, as I recall, I tried compiling something relatively simple without the FP toolbox and it failed). I'd be interested to learn if you (or others) are able to compile anything more complicated or whether you run into issues.
Cheers Jack On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 12:55, Matheus Furlan Alpoin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently, I came across an email by Jack Hickish on this list which > dated back to early 2020, on which he stated that the Fixed-Point > Designer was a basic minimum for compilations, given that it provided > the UFix and Fix data types in Simulink (link here: > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg07887.html). > This statement confused me a bit, because we were able to compile > Tutorial 1 by only using a basic MATLAB + Simulink license, with no > toolboxes included. As we were targeting a ROACH2 board, we did this > compilation on MATLAB R2013b. > > I wonder if the requirement of the aforementioned Toolbox is related to > more recent versions of MATLAB, such as R2018a for SKARAB, or were we > just able to compile the design by a fortunate turn of events? > > Thanks in advance, > > Matheus F. Alpoin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups " > [email protected]" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/d6b9d0e3-a667-468b-5bb2-3009bc64b465%40inpe.br > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/CAG1GKSmWSCLzUx84jh0WNmj9N8vgvo3NcXUYdgA-NwqVRfzogw%40mail.gmail.com.
