Hi Kaj, We are definitely an open collaboration :). A lot of people have done good work documenting what we have. This includes Morag and many others. Mitch has done amazing work and has done his best to document everything, but the RFSoC is new, so there will be teething issues and we ask for more patience.
The whole concept of PRP was discussed last year and to be honest I haven't used it in earnest yet. I still do native installs. I understand your frustration, but we are doing our best as most of the contributers volunteer their time too. Feel free to use the slack channel even though I didn't. Kind regards, Adam On Mon, 21 Feb 2022, 10:40 PM Kaj Wiik, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 21/02/2022 22:15, Morag Brown wrote: > > > While I think most people on this mailing list can certainly share your > > frustrations with getting the toolflow to work, I think it's important > to > > emphasize that this is an open collaboration that many contribute to > without it > > strictly speaking being part of their critical work duties. > > I certainly understand that and personally I have been trying to > contribute by > doing pull requests, trying to ask well formulated questions and sharing > my > successes and solutions. And I have done it outside of my work duties to > support > a project that I find important. So I have been there and done that. > > > As such, writing and maintaining documentation and testing toolflow > > functionality across all configurations of operating systems and > software > > versions is difficult. However we do try our best at these things, and > > definitely try to help however we can whenever someone faces an issue > that has > > either not been documented or even just not yet encountered by > developers. > > The PRP stuff was presented at the 2021 CASPER conference, and has yet > to make > > it's way into our docs. But as Jonathon has said, we do have a CASPER > slack, > > with a PRP channel, and other channels where more help could potentially > be found. > > What I find very disturbing is that there seems to be a working solution > that > would have saved months of time and that is known to many but no-one cared > to > mention it before. > > Is this a really an _open_ _collaboration_? > > Kaj > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups " > [email protected]" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/491ca6ed-b73d-cce9-f0c7-e1808b87d33b%40utu.fi > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/lists.berkeley.edu/d/msgid/casper/CADTJ%3DnH63tAw7tuX59_wL-8a3Xxqf_v8gT04oLq1QqddVyN-XA%40mail.gmail.com.
