On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:48 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Once that's in, for 296 I propose that we proceed with the remove, and > since it will be a clean remove in svn history it will be easy for > Edward or anyone else to revert and work on locally. When progress is > made and CQL sucks less then we can resurrect it in trunk.
+1 -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com
