+1, even though I'm still +1 CQL just -1 time Michael
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Eric Evans<eev...@rackspace.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:48 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >> Once that's in, for 296 I propose that we proceed with the remove, and >> since it will be a clean remove in svn history it will be easy for >> Edward or anyone else to revert and work on locally. When progress is >> made and CQL sucks less then we can resurrect it in trunk. > > +1 > > -- > Eric Evans > eev...@rackspace.com > >
