On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Jonathan Ellis<[email protected]> wrote: > Again, we've been clear about the direction and the timeline for 0.4. > This kind of proposal needed to happen a month ago. It didn't. That > may be a shame, but that's how it works, and trying to hold up > everyone else for your pet feature (without even patches! you'll > pardon me if the implication seems to be that you expect others to do > that part for you) is rude. That's not how OSS should work.
That was not my intent. Evan's provided some good stuff. However, I think your original post would not have incited my post if you'd provided some point at which this could be re-evaluated instead of implying that the subject needed to be dropped altogether. Do you have a suggestion as to when this could be revisited? -- Toby DiPasquale
