+1 I am going to agree with Jonathan. I have been quiet mostly on this
thread, just to see how things played out. I stopped reading after
awhile, as I feel we really need to move past this for now, and defer.
Improving cassandra's performance, feature set and stability should be
our focus IMHO. Right now we have features that make it difficult to
deploy into production. Until we have those things resolved and
working, having major user adoption isn't going to help until we get
all of those things worked out.
On Aug 24, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Toby DiPasquale<[email protected]
> wrote:
That was not my intent. Evan's provided some good stuff. However, I
think your original post would not have incited my post if you'd
provided some point at which this could be re-evaluated instead of
implying that the subject needed to be dropped altogether. Do you
have
a suggestion as to when this could be revisited?
The corollary to "it's too late for 0.4" is "it's too late, period."
Every project reaches a point past which it's no longer worth
revisiting certain fundamental decisions. IMO Cassandra has passed
that point for "what do we call a Column."
-Jonathan
