On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Mark McBride<[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, that makes sense. Is it an ok general rule that the > timestamps should be set to > > 1) The time that the data to be mutated was generated > 2) The current system time if the time the data was mutated isn't available
Yes. > Looking around at code it seems like time 0 is used a lot, which seems > pretty dangerous. We do this in test code to make it obviously clock-independent, yes. -Jonathan
