It's not moderated (click the login link to get to a signup form). Changes are sent to the -commits list where anyone interested (like me :) can review them.
-Jonathan P.S. sorry for the signup captcha questions -- someone apparently thought they were cute, but they typically take a bit of googling to answer. Not our fault! :) On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Mark McBride<[email protected]> wrote: > Cool. There are a few things I've found out recently that should > probably go into the wiki (this, the fact that get_columns_since > silently returns no results if your column family isn't ordered by > time)... is it moderated at all? Should I run changes by the mailing > list? > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Jonathan Ellis<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Mark McBride<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Thanks, that makes sense. Is it an ok general rule that the >>> timestamps should be set to >>> >>> 1) The time that the data to be mutated was generated >>> 2) The current system time if the time the data was mutated isn't available >> >> Yes. >> >>> Looking around at code it seems like time 0 is used a lot, which seems >>> pretty dangerous. >> >> We do this in test code to make it obviously clock-independent, yes. >> >> -Jonathan >> >
