I would tend to agree, I would rather very much have the documentation
revision controlled and stored with the source instead of a separate
online site.  I mentioned the online sites for the "online
collaboration" you mentioned, which reminded me of "wiki" :).

Lyx, or other such tools would allow for this, since you'd just be
editing files in the repo.

Thanks,
Rick Fleming


On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Bill Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I wasn't clear at all about what I would rather: I'd very much want
> to contribute patches to something stored in the repo and have the online
> stuff generated than have to deal with making changes directly online. One
> of the problems with doing the documentation online is that we would lose
> the ability to reject changes and instead would need to undo them after the
> fact.
>
> Richard Fleming wrote:
>
> A quick google search (online docbook editor) shows that there looks
> to be projects around that combine "wiki style" websites with docbook
> generators, which may provide an easy way to maintain docbook stored
> documentation.  I know there are some decent offline tools for docbook
> also, I've used lyx which is a WYSIWYG editor for structured editing,
> although editing the raw files might be clean as well.
>
> Keep in mind I haven't used any of these before, so I don't have
> anything valuable to say about the projects found :).
>
> Thanks,
> Rick Fleming
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Bill Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I am not very familiar with docbook docs (other than reading them), but
> I really do like the output. Would it be written in the repo and the
> sites generated or would it be some sort of collaborative online thing?
>
> Jonathon Rossi wrote:
>
>
> While everyone is on the topic of change, do we want to move to the
> docbook documentation that Symon Rottem set up a while back? It should
> make it easier to write documentation.
>
> Do we really need multiple copies of the documentation hosted like we
> have now? Because documentation tends to lag behind and is always
> being updated after a release it might be better to have one copy like
> jQuery has.
>
> MonoRail example of the docbook format:
> http://www.symbiotic-development.com/monorail/html/index.html
>
> --
> Jonathon Rossi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to