On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. Personally, I don't know if a ActiveRecord project template is very > useful because you can use ActiveRecord in different ways (ActiveRecordBase
Agreed. > 2. There are also quite a few ways to set up MonoRail, so I propose we cut > the functionality of the current wizard back to a basic wizard that builds > you an instantly runnable MonoRail app (with your choice of view engine), > where you can then use the docs to set up more complex things. This comes > back to the point of do we really need new project wizards, are empty sample > projects enough? New users to castle are welcome to reply with their opinion > to this. Agreed. Also, a few months ago I started a new project generator project (using wpf and mef) trying to mimic 'rails'. But it's staled due to my procrastination. > 3. Does anyone see value in integrating Castle Visual Studio Integration > from the contrib with the new project wizards (all installed from one > installer)? Sure. Maybe it's time to promote it to the main trunk. > 5. Are there any VS integration features that we should be employing to make > any Castle project easier to use? There are lots of points that could have integration, but ideas are cheap. The problem is getting to implement them.. > 6. Does anyone see any problems with dropping support for VS2005 since we > are only supporting 3.5 from now on? I don't. -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
