On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Core and DO will build with the 2.0 csc > > why? what's wrong with 3.5 csc targeting 2.0 (which means - no extra dlls > like System.Core etc., and will run smoothly on .NET 2.0 machine with > service packs) > There is nothing wrong with using the 3.5 csc, I was just making the point that it does work. Our build system isn't currently set up to use the 3.5 csc and the 2.0 preprocessor defines. > personally I think that 2.0 compatibility is not needed. People who use > open-source would also use .net 3.5 > I was thinking the same thing, especially that these are new releases. The only reason I kept 2.0 compatibility for Core and DP is that other OSS still wants to support .net 2.0. -- Jono --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
