Can we make a decision about version numbers for the next release. On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote:
> :) > > We'll I was close, it was about going with DP 2.1 instead of 2.0. I'd > expect you'd want to follow the same convention for the rest of the > projects. However, maybe not. > > These are 2 quotes from a discussion about releasing DP 2.0: > > AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're looking into *2.1* or >> 2.0.1 >> > > I'd vote for *2.1* >> 2.0 is very stable. > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thread/aab177d5ee9c5c58/f8ed184bd6739de0?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=dynamicproxy+2.1#f8ed184bd6739de0 > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:26 AM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I have no recollection of saying that :-) >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> - increase the version number (1.0.4.revision) to help distinctify RC3+ >> >> from RTM+ >> > >> > I remember Hammett mentioning at some point he suggested just jumping to >> 1.1 >> > to make it really clear, since 1.0 has basically been a 2 year rolling >> > release off the trunk. What do you think? >> > >> > -- >> > Jono >> > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammett >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Jono > -- Jono --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
