Partly because Windsor is more interesting :). The other part is that I'm not too sure how many people would use a pagination release without MonoRail. So it is more likely they will just use MR and Pagination off the trunk until they are both together as a release.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Colin Ramsay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > When the first person is ready to release a project we will need to work > out > > what needs to go on the castle web site. > > I was ready a little while back but I found it hard to attract comment: > > > http://groups.google.co.uk/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thread/612486486921b690 > > I think it's cos Windsor is inherently more interesting than Pagination ;) > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think it might be best hosting the downloads on sourceforge. This would > > mean more people need write access to it. The main reason is that there > is > > actually heaps of bandwidth currently used for RC3. January 2009 had 42.9 > GB > > downloaded and I would expect that once there are more releases that is > only > > going to increase. Sourceforge has the infrastructure to handle the load. > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php?group_id=124416&ugn=castleproject&type=prdownload&mode=alltime&package_id=0 > > > > I'd expect the package for MR to include AR and MK. For example, because > the > > current MR release might not yet be using the latest released AR. I can > see > > having a full castle package of the current releases that are all > compatible > > which you can just download and be done with it a really good idea. > > > > When the first person is ready to release a project we will need to work > out > > what needs to go on the castle web site. > > > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Colin Ramsay <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> We also need to decide/find out where downloads are going to be hosted. > >> > >> My other slight concern is how to createa synchronised download for > >> people who want a "full suite" of Castle stuff. For example, if we all > >> release separately then a user would have to download all the > >> Components separately, then MR, then Windsor, etc, etc. I know this > >> isn't specific to Windsor but I wanted to raise it anyway. > >> > >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Can we make a decision about version numbers for the next release. > >> > > >> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> :) > >> >> > >> >> We'll I was close, it was about going with DP 2.1 instead of 2.0. I'd > >> >> expect you'd want to follow the same convention for the rest of the > >> >> projects. However, maybe not. > >> >> > >> >> These are 2 quotes from a discussion about releasing DP 2.0: > >> >> > >> >>> AFAIC DP2 was released on the last RC. So you're looking into 2.1 or > >> >>> 2.0.1 > >> >> > >> >>> I'd vote for 2.1 > >> >>> 2.0 is very stable. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thread/aab177d5ee9c5c58/f8ed184bd6739de0?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=dynamicproxy+2.1#f8ed184bd6739de0 > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:26 AM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> I have no recollection of saying that :-) > >> >>> > >> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> >> - increase the version number (1.0.4.revision) to help > distinctify > >> >>> >> RC3+ > >> >>> >> from RTM+ > >> >>> > > >> >>> > I remember Hammett mentioning at some point he suggested just > >> >>> > jumping > >> >>> > to 1.1 > >> >>> > to make it really clear, since 1.0 has basically been a 2 year > >> >>> > rolling > >> >>> > release off the trunk. What do you think? > >> >>> > > >> >>> > -- > >> >>> > Jono > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Cheers, > >> >>> hammett > >> >>> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Jono > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Jono > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Jono > > > > > > > > > > > -- Jono --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
