2.0 RTM On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:34 AM, James Kovacs <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Has the official version number for Windsor RTM been decided? I've > seen 1.0 RTM and 1.1 RTM both suggested. Trunk is currently very > different in ability from 1.0 RC3. Hence the desire by some to call it > 1.1. Others have argued that the full stack (Windsor, Monorail, AR, > etc.) should be released as 1.0 and then diverge. > > The reason that I ask is that I have final edits for a CoDe Magazine > article due this week on Castle Windsor and C# fluent config (hence > I'm using trunk since RC3 doesn't include C# fluent config). So I > would like to include the correct version number in the article so as > not to confuse people. > > So what is it going to be? 1.0 RTM or 1.1 RTM? > > Thanks, > James > > BTW - I plan to incorporate information from the article into the > Castle docs once I can. As far as I know, this is the first time that > Windsor's C# fluent config story is told all in one place. I even > document some features that Craig Neuwirt added on my request. So I > feel obligated to give the documentation back to the project... > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
