Fair enough. I'll update the article. Thanks! James
On Mar 9, 4:28 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > 2.0 RTM > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:34 AM, James Kovacs <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Has the official version number for Windsor RTM been decided? I've > > seen 1.0 RTM and 1.1 RTM both suggested. Trunk is currently very > > different in ability from 1.0 RC3. Hence the desire by some to call it > > 1.1. Others have argued that the full stack (Windsor, Monorail, AR, > > etc.) should be released as 1.0 and then diverge. > > > The reason that I ask is that I have final edits for a CoDe Magazine > > article due this week on Castle Windsor and C# fluent config (hence > > I'm using trunk since RC3 doesn't include C# fluent config). So I > > would like to include the correct version number in the article so as > > not to confuse people. > > > So what is it going to be? 1.0 RTM or 1.1 RTM? > > > Thanks, > > James > > > BTW - I plan to incorporate information from the article into the > > Castle docs once I can. As far as I know, this is the first time that > > Windsor's C# fluent config story is told all in one place. I even > > document some features that Craig Neuwirt added on my request. So I > > feel obligated to give the documentation back to the project... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
