RTM seems to be the common term in the .NET world, GA is in the Java world.I
don't care.

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote:

> So are we going with the "RTM" or "GA" naming for the final release. It
> would be a good idea to make sure all Castle projects use the same naming.
>
> Currently this page has GA, however I am happy to go either way as long as
> we are consistent.
> http://www.castleproject.org/castle/projects.html
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:46 AM, James Kovacs <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Fair enough. I'll update the article.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> James
>>
>> On Mar 9, 4:28 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > 2.0 RTM
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:34 AM, James Kovacs <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > Has the official version number for Windsor RTM been decided? I've
>> > > seen 1.0 RTM and 1.1 RTM both suggested. Trunk is currently very
>> > > different in ability from 1.0 RC3. Hence the desire by some to call it
>> > > 1.1. Others have argued that the full stack (Windsor, Monorail, AR,
>> > > etc.) should be released as 1.0 and then diverge.
>> >
>> > > The reason that I ask is that I have final edits for a CoDe Magazine
>> > > article due this week on Castle Windsor and C# fluent config (hence
>> > > I'm using trunk since RC3 doesn't include C# fluent config). So I
>> > > would like to include the correct version number in the article so as
>> > > not to confuse people.
>> >
>> > > So what is it going to be? 1.0 RTM or 1.1 RTM?
>> >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > James
>> >
>> > > BTW - I plan to incorporate information from the article into the
>> > > Castle docs once I can. As far as I know, this is the first time that
>> > > Windsor's C# fluent config story is told all in one place. I even
>> > > document some features that Craig Neuwirt added on my request. So I
>> > > feel obligated to give the documentation back to the project...
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jono
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to