Krzysztof,

Thanks for your suggestion about the ridiculity, r5605 will default to the
sane behavior you described.

-- Roelof.

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Krzysztof Koźmic <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> This is getting ridiculus.
>
> Can't we just have one build.cmd that when ran without parameters builds
> the stack without any tests or additional stuff, and when ran with
> parameters does what the parameters say?
>
> Krzysztof
>
> Roelof Blom pisze:
> > Yeah.
> >
> > Instead I've deleted release.cmd and added a new enduser.cmd. This
> > currently creates a 'quick debug build', will change it to 'quick
> > release clean build'
> >
> > -- Roelof.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Markus Zywitza
> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     But perhaps we should change release.cmd to call build.cmd quick
> >     release clean build.
> >
> >     -Markus
> >
> >     2009/3/27 Roelof Blom <[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >
> >         Hi Tim,
> >
> >         It *is* fixed, but running some random build script without
> >         reading 'How to build.txt' will get you into trouble, like kzu
> >         demonstrated by twittering.
> >
> >         Like I wrote earlier, run the new *build.cmd* script, for
> >         instance 'build.cmd quick build'.
> >
> >         Please let me know it this works for you.
> >
> >         -- Roelof.
> >
> >
> >         On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]
> >         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >             I'm not sure where things stand but I STILL cannot build
> >             when pulling directly from source.  I am not the only one
> >             either, this is last night on twitter.
> >
> >             http://m.twitter.com/kzu/status/1399399001:
> >
> >                 get castle trunk, run included release.cmd => "'nant'
> >                 is not recognized blah blah...". #FAIL
> >
> >
> >             Can we get this fixed ASAP?  I don't understand why we
> >             can't reduce the friction for building.
> >
> >             Tim
> >
> >
> >             On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Roelof Blom
> >             <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> >
> >                 Hi,
> >
> >                 No, I committed my local stuff. But thanks for the
> >                 patch, it triggered me to commit this stuff. Run the
> >                 new build.cmd script to use the embedded NAnt and NUnit.
> >
> >                 -- Roelof.
> >
> >
> >                 On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Tim Barcz
> >                 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >                     Isn't this what I committed?  Has the patch been
> >                     applied?
> >
> >
> >                     On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Roelof Blom
> >                     <[email protected]
> >                     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >                         Hi,
> >
> >                         I have a version that has NAnt and NUnit
> >                         embedded and has a simple batch file
> >                         (build.cmd) to drive the build. Any objections
> >                         to committing it?
> >
> >                         Cheers,
> >                         Roelof.
> >
> >
> >                         On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Matt Robinson
> >                         <[email protected]
> >                         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >                             +1 then --
> >
> >                             if you'd like some testing help let me know.
> >
> >                             matt
> >
> >                             On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Tim Barcz
> wrote:
> >
> >>                             Basically what'd I'd do is bring in nant
> >>                             and any external libraries that are
> >>                             needed (nunit is another one I can think
> >>                             of) and provide batch files for the most
> >>                             common scenarios.  The idea would be to
> >>                             non-invasive on the build file itself,
> >>                             that's I'd like to leave alone for the
> >>                             reasons you pointed out.  I only want to
> >>                             reduce friction around the current build
> >>                             file/process.
> >>
> >>                             Tim
> >>
> >>                             On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matt
> >>                             Robinson <[email protected]
> >>                             <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>
> >>                                 what files in the current build setup
> >>                                 would this affect?  the nature of the
> >>                                 castle .build files makes it easy to
> >>                                 do complicated things (castle
> >>                                 dynproxy -> nhibernate -> rhino tools
> >>                                 / full castle -> your in-house code),
> >>                                 so I'd only be worried if this would
> >>                                 somehow remove the current
> >>                                 "hookability", if that makes any sense?
> >>
> >>                                 On Feb 11, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Tim
> >>                                 Barcz wrote:
> >>
> >>>                                 I am more than willing to get this
> >>>                                 up and running for major areas of
> >>>                                 the build if you all will let me.  I
> >>>                                 have this on our build here at work
> >>>                                 where everything is referenced
> >>>                                 relatively.  The goal is that the
> >>>                                 users/developers should be able to
> >>>                                 get source and get up and running
> >>>                                 very very quickly.
> >>>
> >>>                                 Despite how this sounds, I see this
> >>>                                 as being very non-invasive and quick
> >>>                                 to do.  I'd love to contribute if
> >>>                                 you guys approve this.
> >>>
> >>>                                 Tim
> >>>
> >>>                                 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:32 PM,
> >>>                                 Julian Birch <[email protected]
> >>>                                 <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>                                     Consider this a +1.
> >>>
> >>>                                     I actually wrote a program to do
> >>>                                     this, I got so bored with all of
> >>>                                     the various bits you need to
> >>>                                     get/know.  Keep meaning to turn
> >>>                                     it into something someone else
> >>>                                     could use.  It downloads Nant,
> >>>                                     Nunit and the rest.
> >>>
> >>>                                     Julian.
> >>>
> >>>                                     2009/2/11 Daniel Hölbling
> >>>                                     <[email protected]
> >>>                                     <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>>
> >>>                                         I'd really love to see that
> >>>                                         since I have failed
> >>>                                         miserably to compile Castle
> >>>                                         from source last week.
> >>>
> >>>                                         Some way to easily compile
> >>>                                         the source would be great.
> >>>                                         (Especially since I often
> >>>                                         hop machines and keeping all
> >>>                                         build tools in sync is quite
> >>>                                         challenging)
> >>>
> >>>                                         Greetings, Daniel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>                                         On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:16
> >>>                                         PM, Bill Barry
> >>>                                         <[email protected]
> >>>                                         <mailto:
> [email protected]>>
> >>>                                         wrote:
> >>>
> >>>                                             hink there should be a
> >>>                                             text file there
> >>>                                             containing instructions
> >>>                                             to get the Nant sour
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to