Yeah. Instead I've deleted release.cmd and added a new enduser.cmd. This currently creates a 'quick debug build', will change it to 'quick release clean build'
-- Roelof. On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Markus Zywitza <[email protected]>wrote: > But perhaps we should change release.cmd to call build.cmd quick release > clean build. > > -Markus > > 2009/3/27 Roelof Blom <[email protected]> > > Hi Tim, >> >> It *is* fixed, but running some random build script without reading 'How >> to build.txt' will get you into trouble, like kzu demonstrated by >> twittering. >> >> Like I wrote earlier, run the new *build.cmd* script, for instance >> 'build.cmd quick build'. >> >> Please let me know it this works for you. >> >> -- Roelof. >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure where things stand but I STILL cannot build when pulling >>> directly from source. I am not the only one either, this is last night on >>> twitter. >>> >>> http://m.twitter.com/kzu/status/1399399001: >>> >>> get castle trunk, run included release.cmd => "'nant' is not recognized >>>> blah blah...". #FAIL >>> >>> >>> Can we get this fixed ASAP? I don't understand why we can't reduce the >>> friction for building. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> No, I committed my local stuff. But thanks for the patch, it triggered >>>> me to commit this stuff. Run the new build.cmd script to use the embedded >>>> NAnt and NUnit. >>>> >>>> -- Roelof. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Isn't this what I committed? Has the patch been applied? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a version that has NAnt and NUnit embedded and has a simple >>>>>> batch file (build.cmd) to drive the build. Any objections to committing >>>>>> it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Roelof. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Matt Robinson < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 then -- >>>>>>> if you'd like some testing help let me know. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> matt >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Tim Barcz wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Basically what'd I'd do is bring in nant and any external libraries >>>>>>> that are needed (nunit is another one I can think of) and provide batch >>>>>>> files for the most common scenarios. The idea would be to non-invasive >>>>>>> on >>>>>>> the build file itself, that's I'd like to leave alone for the reasons >>>>>>> you >>>>>>> pointed out. I only want to reduce friction around the current build >>>>>>> file/process. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Matt Robinson < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> what files in the current build setup would this affect? the nature >>>>>>>> of the castle .build files makes it easy to do complicated things >>>>>>>> (castle >>>>>>>> dynproxy -> nhibernate -> rhino tools / full castle -> your in-house >>>>>>>> code), >>>>>>>> so I'd only be worried if this would somehow remove the current >>>>>>>> "hookability", if that makes any sense? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Tim Barcz wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am more than willing to get this up and running for major areas of >>>>>>>> the build if you all will let me. I have this on our build here at >>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>> where everything is referenced relatively. The goal is that the >>>>>>>> users/developers should be able to get source and get up and running >>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>> very quickly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Despite how this sounds, I see this as being very non-invasive and >>>>>>>> quick to do. I'd love to contribute if you guys approve this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Julian Birch < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Consider this a +1. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I actually wrote a program to do this, I got so bored with all of >>>>>>>>> the various bits you need to get/know. Keep meaning to turn it into >>>>>>>>> something someone else could use. It downloads Nant, Nunit and the >>>>>>>>> rest. >>>>>>>>> Julian. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2009/2/11 Daniel Hölbling <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd really love to see that since I have failed miserably to >>>>>>>>>> compile Castle from source last week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Some way to easily compile the source would be great. (Especially >>>>>>>>>> since I often hop machines and keeping all build tools in sync is >>>>>>>>>> quite >>>>>>>>>> challenging) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Greetings, Daniel >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Bill Barry < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> hink there should be a text file there containing instructions to >>>>>>>>>>> get the Nant sour >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
