I was just about to start doing that :) Sorry for not owning up to my promise on twitter.
2009/5/31 Roelof Blom <[email protected]> > Patrick, > > I've applied all your patches in r5728. > > -- Roelof. > > 2009/5/27 Patrick McEvoy <[email protected]> > > >> I had a little look at both, I can imagine it was hairy! >> >> Also I have a few patching requests to make further progress with the >> mono/linux TC agent. >> >> 1. gacutil permissions >> Root access is required to add a assembly to the gac. Running the >> build as root can't be the recommended way. Till I come up with a >> better we need failonerror="false" >> Other bits of the patch are optional as I have discovered that most >> mono tools support arguments with either - or / >> Patch: >> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/gacutil.diff >> >> 2. Case sensitivity >> Patch: >> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/incorrect_case_on_bin_dir.diff >> >> 3. Explicitly reference System.Web.dll, System.Data.dll, >> System.Configuration.dll >> Patch: >> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/missing_system-data_ref.diff >> Patch: >> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/missing_system-web_ref.diff >> >> 4. Adding set-mono-3.5-framework-configuration target and tweak for >> svn revision capture >> Patch: >> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/mono-3.5-target.diff >> >> 5. More issues with - or / as arguments for nunit, timeout is >> important as some test assemblies currently stall with mono >> Patch: >> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/nunit_commandline_options.diff >> >> 6. Mono bug, it's on my list to add to novell bugzilla :) >> Patch: >> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/potential_mono_bug.diff >> >> 7. Mono can't build some test assemblies or NLog integration, for the >> time being it's more beneficial for the community to ignore them under >> mono, again it's high on my todo list to get them back in. >> Patch: >> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/remove_projects_with_references_to_win_only_assemblies.diff >> >> 8. Microsoft.Build.Engine problems... >> Please comment out SharedLibs/build/NAnt/bin/NAnt.exe.config:1782, >> afaik it's not used and this will only affect nant when targeting >> mono-3.5 >> >> Cheers :) >> >> On May 25, 11:18 pm, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I assume you were looking Castle.NVelocity in the contrib repository, >> not >> > NVelocity in the main repository. >> > >> > I didn't think it was that hard to follow :). I did start it as a >> rewrite >> > but I had to add way too much stuff to support the strange cases when >> you >> > half type something, so it got pretty hairy. >> > >> > I do plan to rename that project, I was going to move it under the CVSI >> > project since it isn't of use outside an IDE, but can rename it to some >> more >> > IDE generic if you want to use it. >> > >> > 2009/5/26 Patrick McEvoy <[email protected]> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > I spent a few hours looking around after you mentioned this, including >> > > looking at the NVelocity codebase... wow, that was hard to follow! I >> > > need to spend more time on it, but it makes sense to use the same >> > > tools/parser if we can. I might even bite the bullet and start a >> > > rewrite of NVelocity, be interesting to see how far I can get in a few >> > > days... :) >> > >> > > Cheers for the heads up. >> > >> > > On May 23, 5:55 pm, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > Have you considered using CVSI's NVelocity parser? It is separate >> from >> > > the >> > > > Visual Studio stuff. >> > >> > >http://using.castleproject.org/display/Contrib/Castle+Visual+Studio+I. >> .. >> > >> > > > 2009/5/24 Patrick McEvoy <[email protected]> >> > >> > > > > That's a good idea! We can can hook it into TC too :) >> > >> > > > > Can someone sort me out with contrib svn access? >> > >> > > > > Cheers P >> > >> > > > > On May 23, 5:15 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > Patrick, >> > >> > > > > > Regarding your monodevelop plugin. >> > > > > > How about moving it to castle-contrib? >> > >> > > > > > Krzysztof >> > >> > > > > > Patrick McEvoy pisze: >> > >> > > > > > > Great to see there's others that are interested too! >> > >> > > > > > > I would be very happy to run and maintain a mono TC agent. >> I'll >> > > setup >> > > > > > > an agent in the next few days with debian, mono-2.4. >> > >> > > > > > > Also just a heads up for debian/ubuntu users: Mirco Bauer >> yesterday >> > > > > > > uploaded mono-2.4 preview packages to his private repo. We've >> found >> > > > > > > mono-2.0 and mono-2.2 too buggy to run the castle stack, so >> don't >> > > > > > > bother trying on a stock jaunty install :) >> > > > > > >http://go-mono.com/forums/#nabble-td23669501 >> > >> > > > > > > And for anyone using MonoDevelop and MR we wrote a little >> plugin, >> > > it's >> > > > > > > rough round the edges but works :) >> > > > > > >http://code.google.com/p/monodevelop-castle/ >> > >> > > > > > > There aren't that many MoMA issues these days, still a few >> things >> > > to >> > > > > > > work out with DP2 tho. >> > >> > > > > > > Cheers P >> > >> > > > > > > On May 22, 4:43 pm, Markus Ewald <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > >> On 5/22/2009 4:54 PM, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote:> Since Mono >> runs on >> > > > > Windows, we might set up a Mono build on a TS server. >> > >> > > > > > >>> Also, TS can run multiple build agents, if you Patrick have >> a >> > > spare >> > > > > > >>> machine you could dedicate to running Linux + Mono Castle >> bulids, >> > > I >> > > > > > >>> think this would be cool, and a great way to ensure good >> > > > > compatibility + >> > > > > > >>> immediate feedback if Windows OK update breaks Linux. >> > >> > > > > > >> A Linux + Mono box would definitely be useful since Win32 + >> Mono >> > > still >> > > > > > >> allows P/Invoke calls to Win32 API functions. >> > > > > > >> Still, a Mono build in any form would go a long way in making >> sure >> > > it >> > > > > at >> > > > > > >> least compiles okay for us Mono users ;-) >> > >> > > > > > >>> Krzysztof >> > >> > > > > > >> -Markus- >> > >> > > > -- >> > > > Jono >> > >> > -- >> > Jono >> >> > > > > -- Jono --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
