The Mono build still doesn't get off the ground: > *Mono 3.5 Profile (mono-3.5) is not installed, or not correctly > configured. Framework directory '/usr/lib/mono/3.5' does not exist. * >
2009/5/31 Roelof Blom <[email protected]> > Guess I should follow on you twitter :-) > > 2009/5/31 Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> > > I was just about to start doing that :) >> >> Sorry for not owning up to my promise on twitter. >> >> 2009/5/31 Roelof Blom <[email protected]> >> >> Patrick, >>> >>> I've applied all your patches in r5728. >>> >>> -- Roelof. >>> >>> 2009/5/27 Patrick McEvoy <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>>> I had a little look at both, I can imagine it was hairy! >>>> >>>> Also I have a few patching requests to make further progress with the >>>> mono/linux TC agent. >>>> >>>> 1. gacutil permissions >>>> Root access is required to add a assembly to the gac. Running the >>>> build as root can't be the recommended way. Till I come up with a >>>> better we need failonerror="false" >>>> Other bits of the patch are optional as I have discovered that most >>>> mono tools support arguments with either - or / >>>> Patch: >>>> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/gacutil.diff >>>> >>>> 2. Case sensitivity >>>> Patch: >>>> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/incorrect_case_on_bin_dir.diff >>>> >>>> 3. Explicitly reference System.Web.dll, System.Data.dll, >>>> System.Configuration.dll >>>> Patch: >>>> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/missing_system-data_ref.diff >>>> Patch: >>>> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/missing_system-web_ref.diff >>>> >>>> 4. Adding set-mono-3.5-framework-configuration target and tweak for >>>> svn revision capture >>>> Patch: >>>> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/mono-3.5-target.diff >>>> >>>> 5. More issues with - or / as arguments for nunit, timeout is >>>> important as some test assemblies currently stall with mono >>>> Patch: >>>> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/nunit_commandline_options.diff >>>> >>>> 6. Mono bug, it's on my list to add to novell bugzilla :) >>>> Patch: >>>> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/potential_mono_bug.diff >>>> >>>> 7. Mono can't build some test assemblies or NLog integration, for the >>>> time being it's more beneficial for the community to ignore them under >>>> mono, again it's high on my todo list to get them back in. >>>> Patch: >>>> https://qmtech.svn.beanstalkapp.com/castleproject_mono/trunk/patches/remove_projects_with_references_to_win_only_assemblies.diff >>>> >>>> 8. Microsoft.Build.Engine problems... >>>> Please comment out SharedLibs/build/NAnt/bin/NAnt.exe.config:1782, >>>> afaik it's not used and this will only affect nant when targeting >>>> mono-3.5 >>>> >>>> Cheers :) >>>> >>>> On May 25, 11:18 pm, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > I assume you were looking Castle.NVelocity in the contrib repository, >>>> not >>>> > NVelocity in the main repository. >>>> > >>>> > I didn't think it was that hard to follow :). I did start it as a >>>> rewrite >>>> > but I had to add way too much stuff to support the strange cases when >>>> you >>>> > half type something, so it got pretty hairy. >>>> > >>>> > I do plan to rename that project, I was going to move it under the >>>> CVSI >>>> > project since it isn't of use outside an IDE, but can rename it to >>>> some more >>>> > IDE generic if you want to use it. >>>> > >>>> > 2009/5/26 Patrick McEvoy <[email protected]> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > I spent a few hours looking around after you mentioned this, >>>> including >>>> > > looking at the NVelocity codebase... wow, that was hard to follow! I >>>> > > need to spend more time on it, but it makes sense to use the same >>>> > > tools/parser if we can. I might even bite the bullet and start a >>>> > > rewrite of NVelocity, be interesting to see how far I can get in a >>>> few >>>> > > days... :) >>>> > >>>> > > Cheers for the heads up. >>>> > >>>> > > On May 23, 5:55 pm, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > > > Have you considered using CVSI's NVelocity parser? It is separate >>>> from >>>> > > the >>>> > > > Visual Studio stuff. >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> http://using.castleproject.org/display/Contrib/Castle+Visual+Studio+I. >>>> .. >>>> > >>>> > > > 2009/5/24 Patrick McEvoy <[email protected]> >>>> > >>>> > > > > That's a good idea! We can can hook it into TC too :) >>>> > >>>> > > > > Can someone sort me out with contrib svn access? >>>> > >>>> > > > > Cheers P >>>> > >>>> > > > > On May 23, 5:15 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> > > > > wrote: >>>> > > > > > Patrick, >>>> > >>>> > > > > > Regarding your monodevelop plugin. >>>> > > > > > How about moving it to castle-contrib? >>>> > >>>> > > > > > Krzysztof >>>> > >>>> > > > > > Patrick McEvoy pisze: >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > Great to see there's others that are interested too! >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > I would be very happy to run and maintain a mono TC agent. >>>> I'll >>>> > > setup >>>> > > > > > > an agent in the next few days with debian, mono-2.4. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > Also just a heads up for debian/ubuntu users: Mirco Bauer >>>> yesterday >>>> > > > > > > uploaded mono-2.4 preview packages to his private repo. >>>> We've found >>>> > > > > > > mono-2.0 and mono-2.2 too buggy to run the castle stack, so >>>> don't >>>> > > > > > > bother trying on a stock jaunty install :) >>>> > > > > > >http://go-mono.com/forums/#nabble-td23669501 >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > And for anyone using MonoDevelop and MR we wrote a little >>>> plugin, >>>> > > it's >>>> > > > > > > rough round the edges but works :) >>>> > > > > > >http://code.google.com/p/monodevelop-castle/ >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > There aren't that many MoMA issues these days, still a few >>>> things >>>> > > to >>>> > > > > > > work out with DP2 tho. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > Cheers P >>>> > >>>> > > > > > > On May 22, 4:43 pm, Markus Ewald <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > > > > >> On 5/22/2009 4:54 PM, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote:> Since Mono >>>> runs on >>>> > > > > Windows, we might set up a Mono build on a TS server. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > >>> Also, TS can run multiple build agents, if you Patrick >>>> have a >>>> > > spare >>>> > > > > > >>> machine you could dedicate to running Linux + Mono Castle >>>> bulids, >>>> > > I >>>> > > > > > >>> think this would be cool, and a great way to ensure good >>>> > > > > compatibility + >>>> > > > > > >>> immediate feedback if Windows OK update breaks Linux. >>>> > >>>> > > > > > >> A Linux + Mono box would definitely be useful since Win32 + >>>> Mono >>>> > > still >>>> > > > > > >> allows P/Invoke calls to Win32 API functions. >>>> > > > > > >> Still, a Mono build in any form would go a long way in >>>> making sure >>>> > > it >>>> > > > > at >>>> > > > > > >> least compiles okay for us Mono users ;-) >>>> > >>>> > > > > > >>> Krzysztof >>>> > >>>> > > > > > >> -Markus- >>>> > >>>> > > > -- >>>> > > > Jono >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Jono >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Jono >> >> >> > > > > -- Jono --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
