All the assembly.version instances should be removed and replaced by project.version in the top-level default.build for the project.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:05 PM, John Simons <[email protected]>wrote: > This will be a breaking change, so if any project "default.build" > files do not have "<property name="assembly.version" value="X.Y.Z.W" / > >" defined (which btw are a lot of them, specially test projects), the > nant script will fail. > Is that ok? > > > On Jan 12, 9:59 pm, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oh I get Roelof now. > > > > Inside Castle.Core.dll's build script it has this: > > <property name="assembly.version" value="1.2.0.0" /> > > > > When we already set this in the script for the project. Yes, I think we > > should remove the assembly.version variable. > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:55 PM, John Simons <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > To set the version of an individual assembly, all you need to do is: > > > - Open the default.build file for the project you want to set > > > - And add "<property name="assembly.version" value="x.y.z.w" />" > > > inside the "init" target, eg: > > > <target name="init" depends="common.init"> > > > <property name="assembly.version" value="3.0.1.0" /> > > > <assemblyfileset id="project.references" > > > basedir="${build.dir}"> > > > </assemblyfileset> > > > </target> > > > > > Cheers > > > John > > > > > On Jan 12, 9:39 pm, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > The project.version property was originally for versioning the > entire > > > > > project, and assembly.version for versioning a specific project > > > assembly. > > > > > > I'm not sure I follow exactly. Are you saying we should get rid of > this: > > > > > > <property overwrite="false" name="assembly.version" > > > > value="${project.major}.${project.minor}.${project.build}.0" /> > > > > <property overwrite="false" name="assembly.version.informational" > > > > > > value="${assembly.major}.${assembly.minor}.${assembly.build}.${svn.revision}" > > > > /> > > > > > > <property name="assembly.major" > > > > value="${version::get-major(version::parse(assembly.version))}" > > > > dynamic="true" /> > > > > <property name="assembly.minor" > > > > value="${version::get-minor(version::parse(assembly.version))}" > > > > dynamic="true" /> > > > > <property name="assembly.build" > > > > value="${version::get-build(version::parse(assembly.version))}" > > > > dynamic="true" /> > > > > <property name="assembly.revision" > > > > value="${version::get-revision(version::parse(assembly.version))}" > > > > dynamic="true" /> > > > > > > > With the schism we should probably drop assembly.version > > > > > > I'm not sure what "schism" means but we don't manually maintain both, > we > > > > only set project.version. I set the project version to 0.0.0.0 in the > > > common > > > > build file because Krzysztof changed it from 1.1 to 1.2 because the > > > logging > > > > services build script didn't have the line to change the project > version. > > > I > > > > don't think we should be using the common file to control any > specific > > > > project. > > > > > > Did I misunderstand you? > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:19 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> *6637* < > > >http://fisheye2.atlassian.com/changelog/castleproject?cs=6637> > > > > >> *jonathon.rossi* Tue, 12 January 2010, 11:18:15 +0100 > > > > >> ------------------------------ > > > > >> Default the project version to 0.0.0.0 so that each project needs > to > > > set > > > > >> its own version number. > > > > >> ------------------------------ > > > > >> buildscripts/common.xml< > > >http://fisheye2.atlassian.com/browse/castleproject/buildscripts/commo.. > .> > > > > >> 6637< > > >http://fisheye2.atlassian.com/browse/castleproject/buildscripts/commo.. > .> > > > > >> (+1-1) diffs< > > >http://fisheye2.atlassian.com/browse/castleproject/buildscripts/commo.. > .> > > > > > > >> show watches < > http://fisheye2.atlassian.com/profile/showWatches.do> > > > > >> ------------------------------ > > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups > > > > > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > [email protected] > > > > > . > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > > > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > > > Jono > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected] > > > . > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > -- > > Jono > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > >--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
