guys, I'm terribly sorry. My internet connection keeps failing, and since it's weekend I can't get tech support to look up the Cables hub. anyway, I've updated all project's version numbers to 2.0.0, and finally succeded with commit (it kept failing as the line dropped in the middle).
Now I'm waiting for TeamCity to complete run. now if someone with SF access can grab the release artifacts once it's done and update SF it would be superb. after it's there I'll update the site. On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:28 AM, John Simons <[email protected]>wrote: > Inline > > On Jan 16, 8:18 pm, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm in the middle of a little enhancement to AspView, and started on > writing > > a "MR2 highlights" text. > > the latter can wait. I've also started collecting latest dlls. > I've already updated all dlls, did I miss any? > > > > > I will *love* any help with the release. > What in particular? > > > > > A question comes out though. > > what version will the projects that are part of Monorail but MR does not > > depend on - Extensions (Windsor/ARSupport/TransformFilters) and the > > view-engines (at least Brail and AspView)? > 2.0.0 > > > > > I think that, going forward, since MR Core has been very stable during > the > > last months, and most changes/requests went to the view-engines, it might > be > > wise to allow releasing of the view engines (and maybe ARSupport also) > more > > often than a whole MR release update. > Yes agree, the more separation the better > > > > > my suggestion - we *do* set them all to 2.0, and they *will* follow > future > > MR version numbers *when* MR gets released, but we will also allow > releasing > > the small projects separately. > 2.0.0 for everything that is compiled by the Monorail project > > > > > make any sense? > Yes > > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:16 AM, John Simons <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > Monorail is now ready to be released. > > > > > Ken, are you going to do it? or do you want me to do it? > > > > > Cheers > > > John > > > > > On Jan 15, 8:14 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Which only reminds me of one thing - we should provide a roadmap for > > > > our projects, even a rough, sketchy one, but that's sending a clear > > > > signal to everyone interested that Castle is being actively > developed. > > > > > > On 15 Sty, 10:11, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Cool :) > > > > > > > On Jan 15, 7:48 pm, Markus Zywitza <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > What's the problem? AR 2.1.1 will be released tonight and > available > > > > > > for MR bundle. > > > > > > > > I planned to release 2.2 Alpha 1 in about 2 weeks when I have an > > > > > > example application for the new IConversation feature I just > > > finished. > > > > > > > > -Markus > > > > > > > > 2010/1/15 Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > That's a bummer. > > > > > > > > > We should have released Validator before AR :/ > > > > > > > Not to make two basically identical releases on the span of two > > > days. > > > > > > > > > Krzysztof > > > > > > > > > On 15 Sty, 08:53, John Simons <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > >> That wasn't the problem. > > > > > > >> The problem is that ActiveRecord is dependant on Validator and > > > > > > >> Validator was released yesterday. > > > > > > > > >> On Jan 15, 5:46 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic < > [email protected]> > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > John, > > > > > > > > >> > we have an ActiveRecord compiled against new Core released > > > > > > >> > Markus released it two days ago. > > > > > > > > >> > Krzysztof > > > > > > > > >> > On 2010-01-15 03:02, John Simons wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > Updated Monorail dependencies (including Boo), but it > wasn't > > > easy! > > > > > > > > >> > > Had to recompile TemplateEngine and ActiveRecord against > > > latest Core + > > > > > > >> > > Validator > > > > > > >> > > So this means that we have 2 more releases to go before > > > Monorail release: > > > > > > >> > > - ActiveRecord > > > > > > >> > > - TemplateEngine (I'll do this one) > > > > > > > > >> > > Also changed IEmailSender to use the one in the Core > > > > > > > > >> > > So, I think once the releases above are done, we should > be > > > good to > > > > > > >> > > release Monorail. > > > > > > >> > > Ken, what's the plan to tackle the lack of documentation, > new > > > > > > >> > > features, breaking changes and bug fixes since the last > > > ‘release’? > > > > > > > > >> > > Cheers > > > > > > >> > > John > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > >> > > *From:* Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > > > > > > >> > > *To:* [email protected] > > > > > > >> > > *Sent:* Fri, 15 January, 2010 7:35:06 AM > > > > > > >> > > *Subject:* Re: Releasing Monorail tomorrow > > > > > > > > >> > > Ken, > > > > > > > > >> > > no problem, I don't think anyone will need it desperately > over > > > the > > > > > > >> > > weekend :) > > > > > > >> > > And if you need a hand with the release, let me know. > > > > > > > > >> > > back to Boo/Brail - do we upgrade to v0.9.3? > > > > > > > > >> > > Krzysztof > > > > > > > > >> > > On 2010-01-14 21:24, Ken Egozi wrote: > > > > > > >> > >> @john: thx for taking care of that > > > > > > >> > >> @Michael: as John put it, nag away :) > > > > > > >> > >> @Krzysztof: yeah > > > > > > >> > >> about that "tomorrow" bit. > > > > > > > > >> > >> I never have set that date. I would never have as > tomorrow is > > > my > > > > > > >> > >> deadline for doing my taxes, and I *really* do not > believe > > > that I'll > > > > > > >> > >> be able to run the release process in a couple of hours > > > afterwards. > > > > > > > > >> > >> I did say that I will dedicate this Saturday to complete > as > > > much as I > > > > > > >> > >> can, and hopefully do the release then. > > > > > > > > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:22 PM, John Simons > > > > > > >> > >> <[email protected] <mailto: > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > >> Applied, thanks Michael. > > > > > > >> > >> And yes please do nag us about it, 2 years to get a > patch > > > applied > > > > > > >> > >> is a bit too much to wait, you have all the right to > nag. > > > > > > > > >> > >> Cheers > > > > > > >> > >> John > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > >> > >> *From:* Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected] > > > > > > >> > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > >> > >> *To:* [email protected] > > > > > > >> > >> <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > >> > >> *Sent:* Fri, 15 January, 2010 4:09:12 AM > > > > > > > > >> > >> *Subject:* Re: Releasing Monorail tomorrow > > > > > > > > >> > >> Michael, > > > > > > > > >> > >> You have every right to be nagging! - this patch was > > > submitted 2 > > > > > > >> > >> years ago. > > > > > > >> > >> There's just one unit test exposing this issue, but > since > > > all > > > > > > >> > >> other tests are passing I would assume it's quite > safe to > > > apply > > > > > > >> > >> (especially that as you say - you've been field > testing > > > it for > > > > > > >> > >> some time). > > > > > > > > >> > >> Ken? John? - any reason for this to not get applied > for > > > v2.0? > > > > > > > > >> > >> cheers, > > > > > > >> > >> Krzysztof > > > > > > > > >> > >> On 2010-01-14 18:02, Michael Davis wrote: > > > > > > >> > >>> Does this mean that there are no plans to address > any of > > > the > > > > > > >> > >>> remaining open issues in Donjon prior to the > Monorail > > > release? > > > > > > >> > >>> If so, are there any plans as to when these issues > might > > > be > > > > > > >> > >>> addressed? > > > > > > > > >> > >>> In particular, I'd like to see someone take a look > at > > > the patch > > > > > > >> > >>> I submitted for MR-ISSUE-494, since I have an > > > application in > > > > > > >> > >>> production that relies on a fix for that problem, > but > > > it'd be > > > > > > >> > >>> nice to know what the plans are for looking at the > other > > > issues > > > > > > >> > >>> as well. The patch I made fixes the problem for my > > > application, > > > > > > >> > >>> at least, but I'd still like someone who is more > > > familiar with > > > > > > >> > >>> the code to look at it in case there is a better way > to > > > do things. > > > > > > > > >> > >>> I hate to sound like I'm nagging, and I really > > > appreciate all > > > > > > >> > >>> the work everyone has done to get this far. I'd > just > > > like to > > > > > > >> > >>> see some indication that someone has at least looked > at > > > the > > > > > > >> > >>> remaining issues before pushing a release out the > door. > > > I can > > > > > > >> > >>> always keep making my own builds of Monorail for my > > > application, > > > > > > >> > >>> if necessary. > > > > > > > > >> > >>> Thanks, > > > > > > >> > >>> Michael Davis > > > > > > > > >> > >>> 2010/1/14 Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected] > > > > > > >> > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> Are we good to go tomorrow? Ken? > > > > > > > > >> > >>> Richard is releasing his components today, and > IIRC > > > these > > > > > > >> > >>> are the only > > > > > > >> > >>> things stopping MR from getting released? > > > > > > > > >> > >>> -- > > > > > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are > subscribed > > > to the > > > > > > >> > >>> Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" > > > group. > > > > > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to > > > > > > >> > >>> [email protected] > > > > > > >> > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>. > > > > > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > >> > >>> > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> <mailto: > > > castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > > > >. > > > > > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > > > > > >> > >>> -- > > > > > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed > to > > > the > > > > > > >> > >>> Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" > group. > > > > > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to > > > > > > >> > >>> [email protected] > > > > > > >> > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>. > > > > > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > > > >> > >>> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > >>> <mailto: > > > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > <castle-project-devel%[email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > > > > > >. > > > > > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > > > > > >> > >> -- > > > > > > >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed > to > > > the > > > > > > >> > >> Google Groups "Castle > > > > ... > > > > read more » > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > -- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.delver.com http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.idcc.co.il - הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
