oops. sorry. I'll fix it soon.
2010/1/17 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > I don't have permission to upload to SF :/ > > Can anyone step in? > > Krzysztof > > > > On 2010-01-17 00:38, John Simons wrote: > >> Oops, we should fix that. >> I'm away from home so I won't be able to upload another package, sorry >> guys. >> >> Cheers John >> >> On 17/01/2010, at 10:10, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> changes.txt in ReleaseNotes in the package says "unreleased" while it >> should be "2.0.0" when outlining new changes. >> Ken, how is it going with the "MR2 highlights" ? >> >> Krzysztof >> >> On 2010-01-16 22:58, John Simons wrote: >> I've uploaded it: >> >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/castleproject/files/MonoRail/2.0/Castle.MonoRail-2.0.0.zip/download >> >> On Jan 16, 10:56 pm, Ken Egozi<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> guys, I'm terribly sorry. My internet connection keeps failing, and since >> it's weekend I can't get tech support to look up the Cables hub. >> anyway, I've updated all project's version numbers to 2.0.0, and finally >> succeded with commit (it kept failing as the line dropped in the middle). >> >> Now I'm waiting for TeamCity to complete run. >> >> now if someone with SF access can grab the release artifacts once it's >> done >> and update SF it would be superb. >> >> after it's there I'll update the site. >> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:28 AM, John Simons<[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> >> Inline >> >> >> On Jan 16, 8:18 pm, Ken Egozi<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm in the middle of a little enhancement to AspView, and started on >> >> writing >> >> a "MR2 highlights" text. >> the latter can wait. I've also started collecting latest dlls. >> >> I've already updated all dlls, did I miss any? >> >> >> I will *love* any help with the release. >> >> What in particular? >> >> >> A question comes out though. >> what version will the projects that are part of Monorail but MR does not >> depend on - Extensions (Windsor/ARSupport/TransformFilters) and the >> view-engines (at least Brail and AspView)? >> >> 2.0.0 >> >> >> I think that, going forward, since MR Core has been very stable during >> >> the >> >> last months, and most changes/requests went to the view-engines, it might >> >> be >> >> wise to allow releasing of the view engines (and maybe ARSupport also) >> >> more >> >> often than a whole MR release update. >> >> Yes agree, the more separation the better >> >> >> my suggestion - we *do* set them all to 2.0, and they *will* follow >> >> future >> >> MR version numbers *when* MR gets released, but we will also allow >> >> releasing >> >> the small projects separately. >> >> 2.0.0 for everything that is compiled by the Monorail project >> >> >> make any sense? >> >> Yes >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:16 AM, John Simons<[email protected] >> wrote: >> >> >> Monorail is now ready to be released. >> >> >> Ken, are you going to do it? or do you want me to do it? >> >> >> Cheers >> John >> >> >> On Jan 15, 8:14 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2)<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Which only reminds me of one thing - we should provide a roadmap for >> our projects, even a rough, sketchy one, but that's sending a clear >> signal to everyone interested that Castle is being actively >> >> developed. >> >> >> On 15 Sty, 10:11, John Simons<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Cool :) >> >> >> On Jan 15, 7:48 pm, Markus Zywitza<[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> What's the problem? AR 2.1.1 will be released tonight and >> >> available >> >> for MR bundle. >> >> >> I planned to release 2.2 Alpha 1 in about 2 weeks when I have an >> example application for the new IConversation feature I just >> >> finished. >> >> >> -Markus >> >> >> 2010/1/15 Krzysztof Koźmic (2)<[email protected]>: >> >> >> That's a bummer. >> >> >> We should have released Validator before AR :/ >> Not to make two basically identical releases on the span of two >> >> days. >> >> >> Krzysztof >> >> >> On 15 Sty, 08:53, John Simons<[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> That wasn't the problem. >> The problem is that ActiveRecord is dependant on Validator and >> Validator was released yesterday. >> >> >> On Jan 15, 5:46 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic< >> >> [email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> John, >> >> >> we have an ActiveRecord compiled against new Core released >> Markus released it two days ago. >> >> >> Krzysztof >> >> >> On 2010-01-15 03:02, John Simons wrote: >> >> >> Updated Monorail dependencies (including Boo), but it >> >> wasn't >> >> easy! >> >> >> Had to recompile TemplateEngine and ActiveRecord against >> >> latest Core + >> >> Validator >> So this means that we have 2 more releases to go before >> >> Monorail release: >> >> - ActiveRecord >> - TemplateEngine (I'll do this one) >> >> >> Also changed IEmailSender to use the one in the Core >> >> >> So, I think once the releases above are done, we should >> >> be >> >> good to >> >> release Monorail. >> Ken, what's the plan to tackle the lack of documentation, >> >> new >> >> features, breaking changes and bug fixes since the last >> >> ‘release’? >> >> >> Cheers >> John >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Fri, 15 January, 2010 7:35:06 AM >> *Subject:* Re: Releasing Monorail tomorrow >> >> >> Ken, >> >> >> no problem, I don't think anyone will need it desperately >> >> over >> >> the >> >> weekend :) >> And if you need a hand with the release, let me know. >> >> >> back to Boo/Brail - do we upgrade to v0.9.3? >> >> >> Krzysztof >> >> >> On 2010-01-14 21:24, Ken Egozi wrote: >> >> @john: thx for taking care of that >> @Michael: as John put it, nag away :) >> @Krzysztof: yeah >> about that "tomorrow" bit. >> >> >> I never have set that date. I would never have as >> >> tomorrow is >> >> my >> >> deadline for doing my taxes, and I *really* do not >> >> believe >> >> that I'll >> >> be able to run the release process in a couple of hours >> >> afterwards. >> >> >> I did say that I will dedicate this Saturday to complete >> >> as >> >> much as I >> >> can, and hopefully do the release then. >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:22 PM, John Simons >> <[email protected]<mailto: >> >> [email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> Applied, thanks Michael. >> And yes please do nag us about it, 2 years to get a >> >> patch >> >> applied >> >> is a bit too much to wait, you have all the right to >> >> nag. >> >> >> Cheers >> John >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> *To:* [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Fri, 15 January, 2010 4:09:12 AM >> >> >> *Subject:* Re: Releasing Monorail tomorrow >> >> >> Michael, >> >> >> You have every right to be nagging! - this patch was >> >> submitted 2 >> >> years ago. >> There's just one unit test exposing this issue, but >> >> since >> >> all >> >> other tests are passing I would assume it's quite >> >> safe to >> >> apply >> >> (especially that as you say - you've been field >> >> testing >> >> it for >> >> some time). >> >> >> Ken? John? - any reason for this to not get applied >> >> for >> >> v2.0? >> >> >> cheers, >> Krzysztof >> >> >> On 2010-01-14 18:02, Michael Davis wrote: >> >> Does this mean that there are no plans to address >> >> any of >> >> the >> >> remaining open issues in Donjon prior to the >> >> Monorail >> >> release? >> >> If so, are there any plans as to when these issues >> >> might >> >> be >> >> addressed? >> >> >> In particular, I'd like to see someone take a look >> >> at >> >> the patch >> >> I submitted for MR-ISSUE-494, since I have an >> >> application in >> >> production that relies on a fix for that problem, >> >> but >> >> it'd be >> >> nice to know what the plans are for looking at the >> >> other >> >> issues >> >> as well. The patch I made fixes the problem for my >> >> application, >> >> at least, but I'd still like someone who is more >> >> familiar with >> >> the code to look at it in case there is a better way >> >> to >> >> do things. >> >> >> I hate to sound like I'm nagging, and I really >> >> appreciate all >> >> the work everyone has done to get this far. I'd >> >> just >> >> like to >> >> see some indication that someone has at least looked >> >> at >> >> the >> >> remaining issues before pushing a release out the >> >> door. >> >> I can >> >> always keep making my own builds of Monorail for my >> >> application, >> >> if necessary. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Michael Davis >> >> >> 2010/1/14 Krzysztof Koźmic (2)<[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> >> Are we good to go tomorrow? Ken? >> >> >> Richard is releasing his components today, and >> >> IIRC >> >> these >> >> are the only >> things stopping MR from getting released? >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are >> >> subscribed >> >> to the >> >> Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" >> >> group. >> >> To post to this group, send email to >> >> ... >> >> read more » >> >> >> >> > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > -- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.delver.com http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.idcc.co.il - הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
