Jono, can you please grant all project leaders access to upload packages to 
sf.net, to prevent this situation in the future. 

Cheers John

On 17/01/2010, at 10:39, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> wrote:

I don't have permission to upload to SF :/

Can anyone step in?

Krzysztof


On 2010-01-17 00:38, John Simons wrote:
Oops, we should fix that.
I'm away from home so I won't be able to upload another package, sorry guys.

Cheers John

On 17/01/2010, at 10:10, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>  wrote:

changes.txt in ReleaseNotes in the package says "unreleased" while it should be 
"2.0.0" when outlining new changes.
Ken, how is it going with the "MR2 highlights" ?

Krzysztof

On 2010-01-16 22:58, John Simons wrote:
I've uploaded it:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/castleproject/files/MonoRail/2.0/Castle.MonoRail-2.0.0.zip/download

On Jan 16, 10:56 pm, Ken Egozi<[email protected]>   wrote:

guys, I'm terribly sorry. My internet connection keeps failing, and since
it's weekend I can't get tech support to look up the Cables hub.
anyway, I've updated all project's version numbers to 2.0.0, and finally
succeded with commit (it kept failing as the line dropped in the middle).

Now I'm waiting for TeamCity to complete run.

now if someone with SF access can grab the release artifacts once it's done
and update SF it would be superb.

after it's there I'll update the site.

On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:28 AM, John Simons<[email protected]>wrote:


Inline


On Jan 16, 8:18 pm, Ken Egozi<[email protected]>   wrote:

I'm in the middle of a little enhancement to AspView, and started on

writing

a "MR2 highlights" text.
the latter can wait. I've also started collecting latest dlls.

I've already updated all dlls, did I miss any?


I will *love* any help with the release.

What in particular?


A question comes out though.
what version will the projects that are part of Monorail but MR does not
depend on - Extensions (Windsor/ARSupport/TransformFilters) and the
view-engines (at least Brail and AspView)?

2.0.0


I think that, going forward, since MR Core has been very stable during

the

last months, and most changes/requests went to the view-engines, it might

be

 wise to allow releasing of the view engines (and maybe ARSupport also)

more

often than a whole MR release update.

Yes agree, the more separation the better


my suggestion - we *do* set them all to 2.0, and they *will* follow

future

MR version numbers *when* MR gets released, but we will also allow

releasing

the small projects separately.

2.0.0 for everything that is compiled by the Monorail project


make any sense?

Yes


On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:16 AM, John Simons<[email protected]
wrote:


Monorail is now ready to be released.


Ken, are you going to do it? or do you want me to do it?


Cheers
John


On Jan 15, 8:14 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2)<[email protected]>   wrote:

Which only reminds me of one thing - we should provide a roadmap for
our projects, even a rough, sketchy one, but that's sending a clear
signal to everyone interested that Castle is being actively

developed.


On 15 Sty, 10:11, John Simons<[email protected]>   wrote:


Cool :)


On Jan 15, 7:48 pm, Markus Zywitza<[email protected]>

wrote:


What's the problem? AR 2.1.1 will be released tonight and

available

for MR bundle.


I planned to release 2.2 Alpha 1 in about 2 weeks when I have an
example application for the new IConversation feature I just

finished.


-Markus


2010/1/15 Krzysztof Koźmic (2)<[email protected]>:


That's a bummer.


We should have released Validator before AR :/
Not to make two basically identical releases on the span of two

days.


Krzysztof


On 15 Sty, 08:53, John Simons<[email protected]>

wrote:

That wasn't the problem.
The problem is that ActiveRecord is dependant on Validator and
Validator was released yesterday.


On Jan 15, 5:46 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<

[email protected]>

wrote:


John,


we have an ActiveRecord compiled against new Core released
Markus released it two days ago.


Krzysztof


On 2010-01-15 03:02, John Simons wrote:


Updated Monorail dependencies (including Boo), but it

wasn't

easy!


Had to recompile TemplateEngine and ActiveRecord against

latest Core +

Validator
So this means that we have 2 more releases to go before

Monorail release:

- ActiveRecord
- TemplateEngine (I'll do this one)


Also changed IEmailSender to use the one in the Core


So, I think  once the releases above are done, we should

be

good to

release Monorail.
Ken, what's the plan to tackle the lack of documentation,

new

features, breaking changes and bug fixes since the last

‘release’?


Cheers
John


------------------------------------------------------------------------

*From:* Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Fri, 15 January, 2010 7:35:06 AM
*Subject:* Re: Releasing Monorail tomorrow


Ken,


no problem, I don't think anyone will need it desperately

over

the

weekend :)
And if you need a hand with the release, let me know.


back to Boo/Brail - do we upgrade to v0.9.3?


Krzysztof


On 2010-01-14 21:24, Ken Egozi wrote:

@john: thx for taking care of that
@Michael: as John put it, nag away :)
@Krzysztof: yeah
about that "tomorrow" bit.


I never have set that date. I would never have as

tomorrow is

my

deadline for doing my taxes, and I *really* do not

believe

that I'll

be able to run the release process in a couple of hours

afterwards.


I did say that I will dedicate this Saturday to complete

as

much as I

can, and hopefully do the release then.


On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:22 PM, John Simons
<[email protected]<mailto:

[email protected]>>   wrote:


    Applied, thanks Michael.
    And yes please do nag us about it, 2 years to get a

patch

applied

    is a bit too much to wait, you have all the right to

nag.


    Cheers
    John


------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From:* Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *To:* [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Fri, 15 January, 2010 4:09:12 AM


    *Subject:* Re: Releasing Monorail tomorrow


    Michael,


    You have every right to be nagging! - this patch was

submitted 2

    years ago.
    There's just one unit test exposing this issue, but

since

all

    other tests are passing I would assume it's quite

safe to

apply

    (especially that as you say - you've been field

testing

it for

    some time).


    Ken? John? - any reason for this to not get applied

for

v2.0?


    cheers,
    Krzysztof


    On 2010-01-14 18:02, Michael Davis wrote:

    Does this mean that there are no plans to address

any of

the

    remaining open issues in Donjon prior to the

Monorail

release?

    If so, are there any plans as to when these issues

might

be

    addressed?


    In particular, I'd like to see someone take a look

at

the patch

    I submitted for MR-ISSUE-494, since I have an

application in

    production that relies on a fix for that problem,

but

it'd be

    nice to know what the plans are for looking at the

other

issues

    as well.  The patch I made fixes the problem for my

application,

    at least, but I'd still like someone who is more

familiar with

    the code to look at it in case there is a better way

to

do things.


    I hate to sound like I'm nagging, and I really

appreciate all

    the work everyone has done to get this far.  I'd

just

like to

    see some indication that someone has at least looked

at

the

    remaining issues before pushing a release out the

door.

 I can

    always keep making my own builds of Monorail for my

application,

    if necessary.


    Thanks,
    Michael Davis


    2010/1/14 Krzysztof Koźmic (2)<[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>


        Are we good to go tomorrow? Ken?


        Richard is releasing his components today, and

IIRC

these

        are the only
        things stopping MR from getting released?


        --
        You received this message because you are

subscribed

to the

        Google Groups "Castle Project Development List"

group.

        To post to this group, send email to

...

read more »


  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.





      
__________________________________________________________________________________
See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now: 
http://au.movies.yahoo.com/session-times/
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.


Reply via email to