No problem at all. I was actually going to ask the same question after I got responses for the initial question, because I don't want them strong named.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:23 PM, John Simons <[email protected]>wrote: > Sorry Jono for hijacking your post but I was just about to start a > thread on the same topic. > > Why are we strong naming the Castle assemblies? > As far as I know it doesn't really gives us any benefits, if we didn't > strong name assemblies we wouldn't have problems like this: > > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thread/4a2cdffa18ab6583 > > Thoughts? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- Jono -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
