http://www.codeplex.com/Signer
On Feb 11, 7:40 pm, James Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > A strong-named assembly cannot use a non-string-named assembly. > Since many of Castle's parts (like Windsor, DP and ActiveRecord), are > used as building blocks of third-party tools -- which themselves might > be strong-named, our assemblied must be. > > Truth, > James > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:23 AM, John Simons <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Why are we strong naming the Castle assemblies? > > As far as I know it doesn't really gives us any benefits, if we didn't > > strong name assemblies we wouldn't have problems like this: > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thr... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
