Thanks John, that looks like a useful utility too. On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:58 PM, John Simons <[email protected]>wrote:
> http://www.codeplex.com/Signer > > On Feb 11, 7:40 pm, James Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > > A strong-named assembly cannot use a non-string-named assembly. > > Since many of Castle's parts (like Windsor, DP and ActiveRecord), are > > used as building blocks of third-party tools -- which themselves might > > be strong-named, our assemblied must be. > > > > Truth, > > James > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:23 AM, John Simons <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Why are we strong naming the Castle assemblies? > > > As far as I know it doesn't really gives us any benefits, if we didn't > > > strong name assemblies we wouldn't have problems like this: > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thr. > .. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- Jono -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
