Is this how MS versions core assemblies like System.dll though .net fx
releases?

On Feb 13, 7:38 am, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote:
> There has been a few threads about people not being able to easily
> (without having to recompile the whole thing) swap assemblies with the
> latest 
> ones.http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thr...
>
> Jono, proposed the following:
> "So maybe the alternative is to not increment the assembly version but
> the
> file version for hotfix/patch releases (i.e. 2.0.1, 2.0.2). Which
> means that
> you could just drop in a patch release without worrying about updating
> dependant libraries, this then ensures the user is using compatible
> versions
> and allows us to fix bugs that don't break public interfaces."
>
> Which I think is a good idea. +1
>
> What does everyone else think about this?
>
> Cheers
> John

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to