@Simone, Does it really matter what MS does? On Feb 13, 11:35 pm, SimoneB <[email protected]> wrote: > Is this how MS versions core assemblies like System.dll though .net fx > releases? > > On Feb 13, 7:38 am, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There has been a few threads about people not being able to easily > > (without having to recompile the whole thing) swap assemblies with the > > latest > > ones.http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thr... > > > Jono, proposed the following: > > "So maybe the alternative is to not increment the assembly version but > > the > > file version for hotfix/patch releases (i.e. 2.0.1, 2.0.2). Which > > means that > > you could just drop in a patch release without worrying about updating > > dependant libraries, this then ensures the user is using compatible > > versions > > and allows us to fix bugs that don't break public interfaces." > > > Which I think is a good idea. +1 > > > What does everyone else think about this? > > > Cheers > > John
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
