+1 2010/2/13 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>: > +1 > On 2010-02-13 07:38, John Simons wrote: >> >> There has been a few threads about people not being able to easily >> (without having to recompile the whole thing) swap assemblies with the >> latest ones. >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thread/9c4ecb75d81c1bf7/ >> >> Jono, proposed the following: >> "So maybe the alternative is to not increment the assembly version but >> the >> file version for hotfix/patch releases (i.e. 2.0.1, 2.0.2). Which >> means that >> you could just drop in a patch release without worrying about updating >> dependant libraries, this then ensures the user is using compatible >> versions >> and allows us to fix bugs that don't break public interfaces." >> >> Which I think is a good idea. +1 >> >> What does everyone else think about this? >> >> Cheers >> John >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
